A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles

Studies of policy bubbles have so far ignored the possibility that a policy bubble in a given policy domain or jurisdiction may constitute an information event for another policy bubble that has been inflated elsewhere. In addition, studies of policy diffusion have paid little attention to the trans...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moshe Maor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OpenEdition 2020-04-01
Series:International Review of Public Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/irpp/774
id doaj-10c67aed068a44dcaaaeef843d73c5f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10c67aed068a44dcaaaeef843d73c5f52020-11-25T03:14:23ZengOpenEditionInternational Review of Public Policy2679-38732020-04-01210.4000/irpp.774A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubblesMoshe MaorStudies of policy bubbles have so far ignored the possibility that a policy bubble in a given policy domain or jurisdiction may constitute an information event for another policy bubble that has been inflated elsewhere. In addition, studies of policy diffusion have paid little attention to the transmission of imperfect and wrongful policy valuations through social networks. To bridge these gaps, this article develops a theoretical framework and methodological toolbox for explaining the potential impact of interbubble dynamics on the sustainment of policy bubbles. This is achieved by focusing on: (i) the diffusion of interbubble connectivity information through social networks characterized by varying levels of segregation; (ii) the perceptions of distorted or corrected information by individuals at the receiving end as being factual, thus requiring no gap-filling by policy actors, or as an opinion that therefore requires gap-filling; (iii) the derived consequence in terms of simple or complex contagion; and (iv) its impact on the sustainment of policy bubbles. The main contribution of the article lies in unpacking the potential causal mechanisms through which a policy bubble can be sustained, even if positive feedback processes and contagion in the jurisdiction within which it developed no longer bolster its support bases.http://journals.openedition.org/irpp/774interbubble dynamicsconnectivity informationsocial networksnetwork segregation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moshe Maor
spellingShingle Moshe Maor
A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
International Review of Public Policy
interbubble dynamics
connectivity information
social networks
network segregation
author_facet Moshe Maor
author_sort Moshe Maor
title A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
title_short A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
title_full A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
title_fullStr A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
title_full_unstemmed A social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
title_sort social network perspective on the interaction between policy bubbles
publisher OpenEdition
series International Review of Public Policy
issn 2679-3873
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Studies of policy bubbles have so far ignored the possibility that a policy bubble in a given policy domain or jurisdiction may constitute an information event for another policy bubble that has been inflated elsewhere. In addition, studies of policy diffusion have paid little attention to the transmission of imperfect and wrongful policy valuations through social networks. To bridge these gaps, this article develops a theoretical framework and methodological toolbox for explaining the potential impact of interbubble dynamics on the sustainment of policy bubbles. This is achieved by focusing on: (i) the diffusion of interbubble connectivity information through social networks characterized by varying levels of segregation; (ii) the perceptions of distorted or corrected information by individuals at the receiving end as being factual, thus requiring no gap-filling by policy actors, or as an opinion that therefore requires gap-filling; (iii) the derived consequence in terms of simple or complex contagion; and (iv) its impact on the sustainment of policy bubbles. The main contribution of the article lies in unpacking the potential causal mechanisms through which a policy bubble can be sustained, even if positive feedback processes and contagion in the jurisdiction within which it developed no longer bolster its support bases.
topic interbubble dynamics
connectivity information
social networks
network segregation
url http://journals.openedition.org/irpp/774
work_keys_str_mv AT moshemaor asocialnetworkperspectiveontheinteractionbetweenpolicybubbles
AT moshemaor socialnetworkperspectiveontheinteractionbetweenpolicybubbles
_version_ 1724642758001426432