A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
In remote sensing, hyperspectral and polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images are the two most versatile data sources for a wide range of applications such as land use land cover classification. However, the fusion of these two data sources receive less attention than many other, becaus...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/6/681 |
id |
doaj-10b82617c6cb40f8abc6f79bf0dc2ade |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10b82617c6cb40f8abc6f79bf0dc2ade2020-11-24T22:11:29ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-03-0111668110.3390/rs11060681rs11060681A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image FusionJingliang Hu0Danfeng Hong1Yuanyuan Wang2Xiao Xiang Zhu3Remote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, GermanyRemote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, GermanySignal Processing in Earth Observation (SiPEO), Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, GermanyRemote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, GermanyIn remote sensing, hyperspectral and polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images are the two most versatile data sources for a wide range of applications such as land use land cover classification. However, the fusion of these two data sources receive less attention than many other, because of their scarce data availability, and relatively challenging fusion task caused by their distinct imaging geometries. Among the existing fusion methods, including manifold learning-based, kernel-based, ensemble-based, and matrix factorization, manifold learning is one of most celebrated techniques for the fusion of heterogeneous data. Therefore, this paper aims to promote the research in hyperspectral and PolSAR data fusion, by providing a comprehensive comparison between existing manifold learning-based fusion algorithms. We conducted experiments on 16 state-of-the-art manifold learning algorithms that embrace two important research questions in manifold learning-based fusion of hyperspectral and PolSAR data: (1) in which domain should the data be aligned—the <i>data domain</i> or the <i>manifold domain</i>; and (2) how to make use of existing <i>labeled data</i> when formulating a graph to represent a manifold—supervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised. The performance of the algorithms were evaluated via multiple accuracy metrics of land use land cover classification over two data sets. Results show that the algorithms based on manifold alignment generally outperform those based on data alignment (data concatenation). Semi-supervised manifold alignment fusion algorithms performs the best among all. Experiments using multiple classifiers show that they outperform the benchmark data alignment-based algorithms by ca. 3% in terms of the overall classification accuracy.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/6/681data fusiongeneralized graph fusionhyperspectral imagedata alignmentlocality preserving projectionsmanifold alignmentmanifold learningMAPPER-induced manifold alignmentpolarimetric SARmanifold alignmentMIMA |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jingliang Hu Danfeng Hong Yuanyuan Wang Xiao Xiang Zhu |
spellingShingle |
Jingliang Hu Danfeng Hong Yuanyuan Wang Xiao Xiang Zhu A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion Remote Sensing data fusion generalized graph fusion hyperspectral image data alignment locality preserving projections manifold alignment manifold learning MAPPER-induced manifold alignment polarimetric SAR manifold alignment MIMA |
author_facet |
Jingliang Hu Danfeng Hong Yuanyuan Wang Xiao Xiang Zhu |
author_sort |
Jingliang Hu |
title |
A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion |
title_short |
A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion |
title_full |
A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion |
title_fullStr |
A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion |
title_sort |
comparative review of manifold learning techniques for hyperspectral and polarimetric sar image fusion |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
In remote sensing, hyperspectral and polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images are the two most versatile data sources for a wide range of applications such as land use land cover classification. However, the fusion of these two data sources receive less attention than many other, because of their scarce data availability, and relatively challenging fusion task caused by their distinct imaging geometries. Among the existing fusion methods, including manifold learning-based, kernel-based, ensemble-based, and matrix factorization, manifold learning is one of most celebrated techniques for the fusion of heterogeneous data. Therefore, this paper aims to promote the research in hyperspectral and PolSAR data fusion, by providing a comprehensive comparison between existing manifold learning-based fusion algorithms. We conducted experiments on 16 state-of-the-art manifold learning algorithms that embrace two important research questions in manifold learning-based fusion of hyperspectral and PolSAR data: (1) in which domain should the data be aligned—the <i>data domain</i> or the <i>manifold domain</i>; and (2) how to make use of existing <i>labeled data</i> when formulating a graph to represent a manifold—supervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised. The performance of the algorithms were evaluated via multiple accuracy metrics of land use land cover classification over two data sets. Results show that the algorithms based on manifold alignment generally outperform those based on data alignment (data concatenation). Semi-supervised manifold alignment fusion algorithms performs the best among all. Experiments using multiple classifiers show that they outperform the benchmark data alignment-based algorithms by ca. 3% in terms of the overall classification accuracy. |
topic |
data fusion generalized graph fusion hyperspectral image data alignment locality preserving projections manifold alignment manifold learning MAPPER-induced manifold alignment polarimetric SAR manifold alignment MIMA |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/6/681 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jinglianghu acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT danfenghong acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT yuanyuanwang acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT xiaoxiangzhu acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT jinglianghu comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT danfenghong comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT yuanyuanwang comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion AT xiaoxiangzhu comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion |
_version_ |
1725805452917211136 |