A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion

In remote sensing, hyperspectral and polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images are the two most versatile data sources for a wide range of applications such as land use land cover classification. However, the fusion of these two data sources receive less attention than many other, becaus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingliang Hu, Danfeng Hong, Yuanyuan Wang, Xiao Xiang Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/6/681
id doaj-10b82617c6cb40f8abc6f79bf0dc2ade
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10b82617c6cb40f8abc6f79bf0dc2ade2020-11-24T22:11:29ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-03-0111668110.3390/rs11060681rs11060681A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image FusionJingliang Hu0Danfeng Hong1Yuanyuan Wang2Xiao Xiang Zhu3Remote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, GermanyRemote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, GermanySignal Processing in Earth Observation (SiPEO), Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, GermanyRemote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, GermanyIn remote sensing, hyperspectral and polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images are the two most versatile data sources for a wide range of applications such as land use land cover classification. However, the fusion of these two data sources receive less attention than many other, because of their scarce data availability, and relatively challenging fusion task caused by their distinct imaging geometries. Among the existing fusion methods, including manifold learning-based, kernel-based, ensemble-based, and matrix factorization, manifold learning is one of most celebrated techniques for the fusion of heterogeneous data. Therefore, this paper aims to promote the research in hyperspectral and PolSAR data fusion, by providing a comprehensive comparison between existing manifold learning-based fusion algorithms. We conducted experiments on 16 state-of-the-art manifold learning algorithms that embrace two important research questions in manifold learning-based fusion of hyperspectral and PolSAR data: (1) in which domain should the data be aligned&#8212;the <i>data domain</i> or the <i>manifold domain</i>; and (2) how to make use of existing <i>labeled data</i> when formulating a graph to represent a manifold&#8212;supervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised. The performance of the algorithms were evaluated via multiple accuracy metrics of land use land cover classification over two data sets. Results show that the algorithms based on manifold alignment generally outperform those based on data alignment (data concatenation). Semi-supervised manifold alignment fusion algorithms performs the best among all. Experiments using multiple classifiers show that they outperform the benchmark data alignment-based algorithms by ca. 3% in terms of the overall classification accuracy.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/6/681data fusiongeneralized graph fusionhyperspectral imagedata alignmentlocality preserving projectionsmanifold alignmentmanifold learningMAPPER-induced manifold alignmentpolarimetric SARmanifold alignmentMIMA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingliang Hu
Danfeng Hong
Yuanyuan Wang
Xiao Xiang Zhu
spellingShingle Jingliang Hu
Danfeng Hong
Yuanyuan Wang
Xiao Xiang Zhu
A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
Remote Sensing
data fusion
generalized graph fusion
hyperspectral image
data alignment
locality preserving projections
manifold alignment
manifold learning
MAPPER-induced manifold alignment
polarimetric SAR
manifold alignment
MIMA
author_facet Jingliang Hu
Danfeng Hong
Yuanyuan Wang
Xiao Xiang Zhu
author_sort Jingliang Hu
title A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
title_short A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
title_full A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
title_fullStr A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Review of Manifold Learning Techniques for Hyperspectral and Polarimetric SAR Image Fusion
title_sort comparative review of manifold learning techniques for hyperspectral and polarimetric sar image fusion
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2019-03-01
description In remote sensing, hyperspectral and polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images are the two most versatile data sources for a wide range of applications such as land use land cover classification. However, the fusion of these two data sources receive less attention than many other, because of their scarce data availability, and relatively challenging fusion task caused by their distinct imaging geometries. Among the existing fusion methods, including manifold learning-based, kernel-based, ensemble-based, and matrix factorization, manifold learning is one of most celebrated techniques for the fusion of heterogeneous data. Therefore, this paper aims to promote the research in hyperspectral and PolSAR data fusion, by providing a comprehensive comparison between existing manifold learning-based fusion algorithms. We conducted experiments on 16 state-of-the-art manifold learning algorithms that embrace two important research questions in manifold learning-based fusion of hyperspectral and PolSAR data: (1) in which domain should the data be aligned&#8212;the <i>data domain</i> or the <i>manifold domain</i>; and (2) how to make use of existing <i>labeled data</i> when formulating a graph to represent a manifold&#8212;supervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised. The performance of the algorithms were evaluated via multiple accuracy metrics of land use land cover classification over two data sets. Results show that the algorithms based on manifold alignment generally outperform those based on data alignment (data concatenation). Semi-supervised manifold alignment fusion algorithms performs the best among all. Experiments using multiple classifiers show that they outperform the benchmark data alignment-based algorithms by ca. 3% in terms of the overall classification accuracy.
topic data fusion
generalized graph fusion
hyperspectral image
data alignment
locality preserving projections
manifold alignment
manifold learning
MAPPER-induced manifold alignment
polarimetric SAR
manifold alignment
MIMA
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/6/681
work_keys_str_mv AT jinglianghu acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT danfenghong acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT yuanyuanwang acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT xiaoxiangzhu acomparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT jinglianghu comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT danfenghong comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT yuanyuanwang comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
AT xiaoxiangzhu comparativereviewofmanifoldlearningtechniquesforhyperspectralandpolarimetricsarimagefusion
_version_ 1725805452917211136