An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna

This study develops a methodology for the assessment of disproportionate costs according to the Water Framework Directive guidelines. The originality of the approach lies in the focus on the interdependencies between water bodies and the consideration of the multiple interactions between measures an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Galioto, Valentina Marconi, Meri Raggi, Davide Viaggi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-11-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/4/1967
id doaj-10ae790b2d4d40d69eb149b79201a8fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10ae790b2d4d40d69eb149b79201a8fa2020-11-24T22:07:30ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412013-11-01541967199510.3390/w5041967w5041967An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-RomagnaFrancesco Galioto0Valentina Marconi1Meri Raggi2Davide Viaggi3Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, Bologna 40127, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, Bologna 40127, ItalyDepartment of Statistical Science, University of Bologna, Via delle Belle Arti 41, Bologna 40126, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, Bologna 40127, ItalyThis study develops a methodology for the assessment of disproportionate costs according to the Water Framework Directive guidelines. The originality of the approach lies in the focus on the interdependencies between water bodies and the consideration of the multiple interactions between measures and pressures. However, the broad architecture of the study fits into a wider assessment procedure, already developed in recent studies. Specifically, a cost effectiveness analysis, implemented to select an efficient combination of measures, is integrated with a cost benefit analysis, which allows for the evaluation of the economic feasibility of the proposed actions. This methodology is applied to the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). In spite of the uncertainties in the estimations of costs and benefits, the study enables the identification of areas where disproportionate costs are more likely to occur. The results show that disproportionality tends to increase from foothill regions, where most of the functional uses of regional water resources are found, to plain areas, where the sources of pressure tend to be located. Finally, the study offers policy direction for the selection of measures in the case study region.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/4/1967cost disproportionalityWater Framework Directive (WFD)cost effectiveness analysis (CEA)cost benefit analysis (CBA)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesco Galioto
Valentina Marconi
Meri Raggi
Davide Viaggi
spellingShingle Francesco Galioto
Valentina Marconi
Meri Raggi
Davide Viaggi
An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna
Water
cost disproportionality
Water Framework Directive (WFD)
cost effectiveness analysis (CEA)
cost benefit analysis (CBA)
author_facet Francesco Galioto
Valentina Marconi
Meri Raggi
Davide Viaggi
author_sort Francesco Galioto
title An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna
title_short An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna
title_full An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna
title_fullStr An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna
title_sort assessment of disproportionate costs in wfd: the experience of emilia-romagna
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2013-11-01
description This study develops a methodology for the assessment of disproportionate costs according to the Water Framework Directive guidelines. The originality of the approach lies in the focus on the interdependencies between water bodies and the consideration of the multiple interactions between measures and pressures. However, the broad architecture of the study fits into a wider assessment procedure, already developed in recent studies. Specifically, a cost effectiveness analysis, implemented to select an efficient combination of measures, is integrated with a cost benefit analysis, which allows for the evaluation of the economic feasibility of the proposed actions. This methodology is applied to the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). In spite of the uncertainties in the estimations of costs and benefits, the study enables the identification of areas where disproportionate costs are more likely to occur. The results show that disproportionality tends to increase from foothill regions, where most of the functional uses of regional water resources are found, to plain areas, where the sources of pressure tend to be located. Finally, the study offers policy direction for the selection of measures in the case study region.
topic cost disproportionality
Water Framework Directive (WFD)
cost effectiveness analysis (CEA)
cost benefit analysis (CBA)
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/4/1967
work_keys_str_mv AT francescogalioto anassessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT valentinamarconi anassessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT meriraggi anassessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT davideviaggi anassessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT francescogalioto assessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT valentinamarconi assessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT meriraggi assessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
AT davideviaggi assessmentofdisproportionatecostsinwfdtheexperienceofemiliaromagna
_version_ 1725820081776099328