Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation
The target study explores whether evaluations of the same piece of music differ under two distinct listening conditions: listening to a piece described either as an improvisation or as a preexisting composition. Participants (N = 16) in the two conditions listened to the same musical piece and provi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Ohio State University Libraries
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Empirical Musicology Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://emusicology.org/article/view/6387 |
id |
doaj-10a4a9edb9a144df9d9e00740f211a81 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10a4a9edb9a144df9d9e00740f211a812020-11-24T23:13:31ZengThe Ohio State University LibrariesEmpirical Musicology Review1559-57492019-01-01131-2162010.18061/emr.v13i1-2.63874153Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to ImprovisationManuel Anglada-Tort0Audio Communication Group, Technische Universität BerlinThe target study explores whether evaluations of the same piece of music differ under two distinct listening conditions: listening to a piece described either as an improvisation or as a preexisting composition. Participants (N = 16) in the two conditions listened to the same musical piece and provided verbal evaluative judgements. The author used a grounded theory approach to analyze listeners' responses, reporting different listening experiences in the two groups. The findings provide unique insights to enable a greater understanding of the nature of the aesthetics of improvisation. In this commentary, I first discuss the strengths of the article, followed by methodological considerations and suggestions for future research. I then present a short literature review and discussion of what I consider the most relevant topic in relation to this study, namely, the effects of contextual information on subjective evaluations.http://emusicology.org/article/view/6387improvisationaestheticsmusic evaluationcontextual information |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Manuel Anglada-Tort |
spellingShingle |
Manuel Anglada-Tort Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation Empirical Musicology Review improvisation aesthetics music evaluation contextual information |
author_facet |
Manuel Anglada-Tort |
author_sort |
Manuel Anglada-Tort |
title |
Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation |
title_short |
Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation |
title_full |
Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation |
title_fullStr |
Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Commentary on Canonne (2018): Listening to Improvisation |
title_sort |
commentary on canonne (2018): listening to improvisation |
publisher |
The Ohio State University Libraries |
series |
Empirical Musicology Review |
issn |
1559-5749 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The target study explores whether evaluations of the same piece of music differ under two distinct listening conditions: listening to a piece described either as an improvisation or as a preexisting composition. Participants (N = 16) in the two conditions listened to the same musical piece and provided verbal evaluative judgements. The author used a grounded theory approach to analyze listeners' responses, reporting different listening experiences in the two groups. The findings provide unique insights to enable a greater understanding of the nature of the aesthetics of improvisation. In this commentary, I first discuss the strengths of the article, followed by methodological considerations and suggestions for future research. I then present a short literature review and discussion of what I consider the most relevant topic in relation to this study, namely, the effects of contextual information on subjective evaluations. |
topic |
improvisation aesthetics music evaluation contextual information |
url |
http://emusicology.org/article/view/6387 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manuelangladatort commentaryoncanonne2018listeningtoimprovisation |
_version_ |
1725598055462338560 |