The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer

Background: The agreement of new instruments or clinical tests with other instruments or tests defines the possibility of these being used interchangeably. Aim: To investigate the validity and reliability of the SW-100 autokeratometer using a Bausch & Lomb (B&L) keratometer as the ‘gold sta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eghosasere Iyamu, O. Mary-Anne Amiebenomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-07-01
Series:African Vision and Eye Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/26
id doaj-10a3fca6c8d447108ad841accdd55d13
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10a3fca6c8d447108ad841accdd55d132020-11-24T21:34:24ZengAOSISAfrican Vision and Eye Health2413-31832410-15162015-07-01741e1e510.4102/aveh.v74i1.26274The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometerEghosasere Iyamu0O. Mary-Anne Amiebenomo1Department of Optometry, University of BeninDepartment of Optometry, University of BeninBackground: The agreement of new instruments or clinical tests with other instruments or tests defines the possibility of these being used interchangeably. Aim: To investigate the validity and reliability of the SW-100 autokeratometer using a Bausch & Lomb (B&L) keratometer as the ‘gold standard’. Methods: Eighty subjects (80 right eyes) aged between 21 and 38 years were recruited. For intra-test repeatability, two measurements of the corneal radius of curvature were taken with the SW-100 and B&L keratometers. Forty of the 80 subjects participated in the inter-test repeatability measurement. Results: Corneal radius of curvature was found to be statistically different between the two instruments (p < 0.001), with the SW-100 providing slightly flatter values of 0.11 mm and 0.05 mm for the horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively, than the B&L keratometer. The average corneal curvature was 0.07 mm flatter with the SW-100 autokeratometer than with the B&L device. Agreement between the SW-100 and B&L keratometers’ axes was 45% within ± 5°, 60.3% within ± 10°, 78.8% within ± 15°, 80.3% within ± 20°, and 88.7% within ± 40°. Intertest repeatability was better for the B&L device than the SW-100 and showed no significant difference between the two sessions. Both instruments demonstrated comparable intrasession repeatability. As such, both instruments were comparatively reliable (per coefficients of repeatability). The range of limits of agreement of ± 0.14 mm (horizontal meridian) and ± 0.17 mm (vertical meridian) between the SW-100 and B&L devices showed good agreement. Conclusion: The results suggest that the SW-100 autokeratometer is a reliable and objective instrument that, however, provides flatter radii of curvature measurements than the B&L keratometer. A compensating factor incorporated into the instrument could reduce the difference between the two instruments and make them more interchangeable.https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/26SW-100 autokeratometer, Bausch & Lomb keratometer, limit of agreement, repeatability, validity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eghosasere Iyamu
O. Mary-Anne Amiebenomo
spellingShingle Eghosasere Iyamu
O. Mary-Anne Amiebenomo
The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer
African Vision and Eye Health
SW-100 autokeratometer, Bausch & Lomb keratometer, limit of agreement, repeatability, validity
author_facet Eghosasere Iyamu
O. Mary-Anne Amiebenomo
author_sort Eghosasere Iyamu
title The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer
title_short The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer
title_full The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer
title_fullStr The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer
title_full_unstemmed The validity and reliability of the handheld SW-100 autokeratometer
title_sort validity and reliability of the handheld sw-100 autokeratometer
publisher AOSIS
series African Vision and Eye Health
issn 2413-3183
2410-1516
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Background: The agreement of new instruments or clinical tests with other instruments or tests defines the possibility of these being used interchangeably. Aim: To investigate the validity and reliability of the SW-100 autokeratometer using a Bausch & Lomb (B&L) keratometer as the ‘gold standard’. Methods: Eighty subjects (80 right eyes) aged between 21 and 38 years were recruited. For intra-test repeatability, two measurements of the corneal radius of curvature were taken with the SW-100 and B&L keratometers. Forty of the 80 subjects participated in the inter-test repeatability measurement. Results: Corneal radius of curvature was found to be statistically different between the two instruments (p < 0.001), with the SW-100 providing slightly flatter values of 0.11 mm and 0.05 mm for the horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively, than the B&L keratometer. The average corneal curvature was 0.07 mm flatter with the SW-100 autokeratometer than with the B&L device. Agreement between the SW-100 and B&L keratometers’ axes was 45% within ± 5°, 60.3% within ± 10°, 78.8% within ± 15°, 80.3% within ± 20°, and 88.7% within ± 40°. Intertest repeatability was better for the B&L device than the SW-100 and showed no significant difference between the two sessions. Both instruments demonstrated comparable intrasession repeatability. As such, both instruments were comparatively reliable (per coefficients of repeatability). The range of limits of agreement of ± 0.14 mm (horizontal meridian) and ± 0.17 mm (vertical meridian) between the SW-100 and B&L devices showed good agreement. Conclusion: The results suggest that the SW-100 autokeratometer is a reliable and objective instrument that, however, provides flatter radii of curvature measurements than the B&L keratometer. A compensating factor incorporated into the instrument could reduce the difference between the two instruments and make them more interchangeable.
topic SW-100 autokeratometer, Bausch & Lomb keratometer, limit of agreement, repeatability, validity
url https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/26
work_keys_str_mv AT eghosasereiyamu thevalidityandreliabilityofthehandheldsw100autokeratometer
AT omaryanneamiebenomo thevalidityandreliabilityofthehandheldsw100autokeratometer
AT eghosasereiyamu validityandreliabilityofthehandheldsw100autokeratometer
AT omaryanneamiebenomo validityandreliabilityofthehandheldsw100autokeratometer
_version_ 1725949697351221248