Setting standards for empirical bioethics research: a response to Carter and Cribb
Abstract This paper responds to the commentaries from Stacy Carter and Alan Cribb. We pick up on two main themes in our response. First, we reflect on how the process of setting standards for empirical bioethics research entails drawing boundaries around what research counts as empirical bioethics r...
Main Authors: | Michael Dunn, Jonathan Ives, Bert Molewijk, Jan Schildmann |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0302-5 |
Similar Items
-
Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus
by: Jonathan Ives, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Let’s talk about standards: a commentary on standards of practice in empirical bioethics
by: Alan Cribb
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Mapping, framing, shaping: a framework for empirical bioethics research projects
by: Richard Huxtable, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Debating diversity: a commentary on Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research
by: Stacy M. Carter
Published: (2018-07-01) -
The use of empirical research in bioethics: a survey of researchers in twelve European countries
by: Tenzin Wangmo, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)