Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection

Abstract Background Residual disinfection is often used to suppress biological growth in drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs), but not without undesirable side effects. In this study, water-main biofilms, drinking water, and bacteria under corrosion tubercles were analyzed from a chloraminate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael B. Waak, Raymond M. Hozalski, Cynthia Hallé, Timothy M. LaPara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Microbiome
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-019-0707-5
id doaj-108ad48e81f14aee9ac231988d7dae93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-108ad48e81f14aee9ac231988d7dae932020-11-25T03:34:21ZengBMCMicrobiome2049-26182019-06-017111410.1186/s40168-019-0707-5Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfectionMichael B. Waak0Raymond M. Hozalski1Cynthia Hallé2Timothy M. LaPara3Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo-Engineering, University of MinnesotaDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geo-Engineering, University of MinnesotaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geo-Engineering, University of MinnesotaAbstract Background Residual disinfection is often used to suppress biological growth in drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs), but not without undesirable side effects. In this study, water-main biofilms, drinking water, and bacteria under corrosion tubercles were analyzed from a chloraminated DWDS (USA) and a no-residual DWDS (Norway). Using quantitative real-time PCR, we quantified bacterial 16S rRNA genes and ammonia monooxygenase genes (amoA) of Nitrosomonas oligotropha and ammonia-oxidizing archaea—organisms that may contribute to chloramine loss. PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes were sequenced to assess community taxa and diversity. Results The chloraminated DWDS had lower biofilm biomass (P=1×10−6) but higher N. oligotropha-like amoA genes (P=2×10−7) than the no-residual DWDS (medians =4.7×104 and 1.1×103 amoA copies cm−2, chloraminated and no residual, respectively); archaeal amoA genes were only detected in the no-residual DWDS (median =2.8×104 copies cm−2). Unlike the no-residual DWDS, biofilms in the chloraminated DWDS had lower within-sample diversity than the corresponding drinking water (P<1×10−4). Chloramine was also associated with biofilms dominated by the genera, Mycobacterium and Nitrosomonas (≤91.7% and ≤39.6% of sequences, respectively). Under-tubercle communities from both systems contained corrosion-associated taxa, especially Desulfovibrio spp. (≤98.4% of sequences). Conclusions Although residual chloramine appeared to decrease biofilm biomass and alpha diversity as intended, it selected for environmental mycobacteria and Nitrosomonas oligotropha—taxa that may pose water quality challenges. Drinking water contained common freshwater plankton and did not resemble corresponding biofilm communities in either DWDS; monitoring of tap water alone may therefore miss significant constituents of the DWDS microbiome. Corrosion-associated Desulfovibrio spp. were observed under tubercles in both systems but were particularly dominant in the chloraminated DWDS, possibly due to the addition of sulfate from the coagulant alum.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-019-0707-5Drinking water distribution systemsBiofilm bacteria16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencingResidual chloramine disinfection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael B. Waak
Raymond M. Hozalski
Cynthia Hallé
Timothy M. LaPara
spellingShingle Michael B. Waak
Raymond M. Hozalski
Cynthia Hallé
Timothy M. LaPara
Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
Microbiome
Drinking water distribution systems
Biofilm bacteria
16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
Residual chloramine disinfection
author_facet Michael B. Waak
Raymond M. Hozalski
Cynthia Hallé
Timothy M. LaPara
author_sort Michael B. Waak
title Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
title_short Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
title_full Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
title_fullStr Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
title_sort comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
publisher BMC
series Microbiome
issn 2049-2618
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Residual disinfection is often used to suppress biological growth in drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs), but not without undesirable side effects. In this study, water-main biofilms, drinking water, and bacteria under corrosion tubercles were analyzed from a chloraminated DWDS (USA) and a no-residual DWDS (Norway). Using quantitative real-time PCR, we quantified bacterial 16S rRNA genes and ammonia monooxygenase genes (amoA) of Nitrosomonas oligotropha and ammonia-oxidizing archaea—organisms that may contribute to chloramine loss. PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes were sequenced to assess community taxa and diversity. Results The chloraminated DWDS had lower biofilm biomass (P=1×10−6) but higher N. oligotropha-like amoA genes (P=2×10−7) than the no-residual DWDS (medians =4.7×104 and 1.1×103 amoA copies cm−2, chloraminated and no residual, respectively); archaeal amoA genes were only detected in the no-residual DWDS (median =2.8×104 copies cm−2). Unlike the no-residual DWDS, biofilms in the chloraminated DWDS had lower within-sample diversity than the corresponding drinking water (P<1×10−4). Chloramine was also associated with biofilms dominated by the genera, Mycobacterium and Nitrosomonas (≤91.7% and ≤39.6% of sequences, respectively). Under-tubercle communities from both systems contained corrosion-associated taxa, especially Desulfovibrio spp. (≤98.4% of sequences). Conclusions Although residual chloramine appeared to decrease biofilm biomass and alpha diversity as intended, it selected for environmental mycobacteria and Nitrosomonas oligotropha—taxa that may pose water quality challenges. Drinking water contained common freshwater plankton and did not resemble corresponding biofilm communities in either DWDS; monitoring of tap water alone may therefore miss significant constituents of the DWDS microbiome. Corrosion-associated Desulfovibrio spp. were observed under tubercles in both systems but were particularly dominant in the chloraminated DWDS, possibly due to the addition of sulfate from the coagulant alum.
topic Drinking water distribution systems
Biofilm bacteria
16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
Residual chloramine disinfection
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-019-0707-5
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelbwaak comparisonofthemicrobiomesoftwodrinkingwaterdistributionsystemswithandwithoutresidualchloraminedisinfection
AT raymondmhozalski comparisonofthemicrobiomesoftwodrinkingwaterdistributionsystemswithandwithoutresidualchloraminedisinfection
AT cynthiahalle comparisonofthemicrobiomesoftwodrinkingwaterdistributionsystemswithandwithoutresidualchloraminedisinfection
AT timothymlapara comparisonofthemicrobiomesoftwodrinkingwaterdistributionsystemswithandwithoutresidualchloraminedisinfection
_version_ 1724559283145670656