A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management

Abstract People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. R. Haddaway, C. Kohl, N. Rebelo da Silva, J. Schiemann, A. Spök, R. Stewart, J. B. Sweet, R. Wilhelm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-05-01
Series:Environmental Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8
id doaj-108a04ba2cc64e37b1d7eb2930ab85e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-108a04ba2cc64e37b1d7eb2930ab85e42020-11-24T21:49:04ZengBMCEnvironmental Evidence2047-23822017-05-016111410.1186/s13750-017-0089-8A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental managementN. R. Haddaway0C. Kohl1N. Rebelo da Silva2J. Schiemann3A. Spök4R. Stewart5J. B. Sweet6R. Wilhelm7Mistra EviEM, Stockholm Environment InstituteFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)CEE Jo’burg, Centre for Anthropological Research (CfAR), University of JohannesburgFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt|Wien Graz and IFZ-Inter-University Research Centre for Technology, Work and CultureCEE Jo’burg, Centre for Anthropological Research (CfAR), University of JohannesburgJT Environmental Consultants (JTEC)Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)Abstract People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders in environmental projects has been recognised as critical for ensuring their success and equally for the syntheses of evidence of what works, where, and for whom, providing key benefits and challenges. As a result of increased interest in systematic reviews of complex management issues, there is a need for guidance in best practices for stakeholder engagement. Here, we propose a framework for stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews/systematic maps, highlighting recommendations and advice that are critical for effective, efficient and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. The discussion herein aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities, whilst also recommending approaches from stakeholder engagement research that may prove to be particularly useful for systematic reviews and systematic maps.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8StakeholdersCommunicationDisseminationMethodologyBest practiceConflict resolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. R. Haddaway
C. Kohl
N. Rebelo da Silva
J. Schiemann
A. Spök
R. Stewart
J. B. Sweet
R. Wilhelm
spellingShingle N. R. Haddaway
C. Kohl
N. Rebelo da Silva
J. Schiemann
A. Spök
R. Stewart
J. B. Sweet
R. Wilhelm
A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
Environmental Evidence
Stakeholders
Communication
Dissemination
Methodology
Best practice
Conflict resolution
author_facet N. R. Haddaway
C. Kohl
N. Rebelo da Silva
J. Schiemann
A. Spök
R. Stewart
J. B. Sweet
R. Wilhelm
author_sort N. R. Haddaway
title A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
title_short A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
title_full A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
title_fullStr A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
title_full_unstemmed A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
title_sort framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
publisher BMC
series Environmental Evidence
issn 2047-2382
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders in environmental projects has been recognised as critical for ensuring their success and equally for the syntheses of evidence of what works, where, and for whom, providing key benefits and challenges. As a result of increased interest in systematic reviews of complex management issues, there is a need for guidance in best practices for stakeholder engagement. Here, we propose a framework for stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews/systematic maps, highlighting recommendations and advice that are critical for effective, efficient and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. The discussion herein aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities, whilst also recommending approaches from stakeholder engagement research that may prove to be particularly useful for systematic reviews and systematic maps.
topic Stakeholders
Communication
Dissemination
Methodology
Best practice
Conflict resolution
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nrhaddaway aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT ckohl aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT nrebelodasilva aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT jschiemann aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT aspok aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT rstewart aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT jbsweet aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT rwilhelm aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT nrhaddaway frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT ckohl frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT nrebelodasilva frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT jschiemann frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT aspok frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT rstewart frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT jbsweet frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
AT rwilhelm frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement
_version_ 1725889744367255552