A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
Abstract People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Environmental Evidence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8 |
id |
doaj-108a04ba2cc64e37b1d7eb2930ab85e4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-108a04ba2cc64e37b1d7eb2930ab85e42020-11-24T21:49:04ZengBMCEnvironmental Evidence2047-23822017-05-016111410.1186/s13750-017-0089-8A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental managementN. R. Haddaway0C. Kohl1N. Rebelo da Silva2J. Schiemann3A. Spök4R. Stewart5J. B. Sweet6R. Wilhelm7Mistra EviEM, Stockholm Environment InstituteFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)CEE Jo’burg, Centre for Anthropological Research (CfAR), University of JohannesburgFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt|Wien Graz and IFZ-Inter-University Research Centre for Technology, Work and CultureCEE Jo’burg, Centre for Anthropological Research (CfAR), University of JohannesburgJT Environmental Consultants (JTEC)Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI)Abstract People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders in environmental projects has been recognised as critical for ensuring their success and equally for the syntheses of evidence of what works, where, and for whom, providing key benefits and challenges. As a result of increased interest in systematic reviews of complex management issues, there is a need for guidance in best practices for stakeholder engagement. Here, we propose a framework for stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews/systematic maps, highlighting recommendations and advice that are critical for effective, efficient and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. The discussion herein aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities, whilst also recommending approaches from stakeholder engagement research that may prove to be particularly useful for systematic reviews and systematic maps.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8StakeholdersCommunicationDisseminationMethodologyBest practiceConflict resolution |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
N. R. Haddaway C. Kohl N. Rebelo da Silva J. Schiemann A. Spök R. Stewart J. B. Sweet R. Wilhelm |
spellingShingle |
N. R. Haddaway C. Kohl N. Rebelo da Silva J. Schiemann A. Spök R. Stewart J. B. Sweet R. Wilhelm A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management Environmental Evidence Stakeholders Communication Dissemination Methodology Best practice Conflict resolution |
author_facet |
N. R. Haddaway C. Kohl N. Rebelo da Silva J. Schiemann A. Spök R. Stewart J. B. Sweet R. Wilhelm |
author_sort |
N. R. Haddaway |
title |
A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management |
title_short |
A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management |
title_full |
A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management |
title_fullStr |
A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management |
title_full_unstemmed |
A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management |
title_sort |
framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Environmental Evidence |
issn |
2047-2382 |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
Abstract People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders in environmental projects has been recognised as critical for ensuring their success and equally for the syntheses of evidence of what works, where, and for whom, providing key benefits and challenges. As a result of increased interest in systematic reviews of complex management issues, there is a need for guidance in best practices for stakeholder engagement. Here, we propose a framework for stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews/systematic maps, highlighting recommendations and advice that are critical for effective, efficient and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. The discussion herein aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities, whilst also recommending approaches from stakeholder engagement research that may prove to be particularly useful for systematic reviews and systematic maps. |
topic |
Stakeholders Communication Dissemination Methodology Best practice Conflict resolution |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0089-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nrhaddaway aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT ckohl aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT nrebelodasilva aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT jschiemann aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT aspok aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT rstewart aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT jbsweet aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT rwilhelm aframeworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT nrhaddaway frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT ckohl frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT nrebelodasilva frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT jschiemann frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT aspok frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT rstewart frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT jbsweet frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement AT rwilhelm frameworkforstakeholderengagementduringsystematicreviewsandmapsinenvironmentalmanagement |
_version_ |
1725889744367255552 |