The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251840 |
id |
doaj-10884f2639314e90a8390b8f6ec1c127 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10884f2639314e90a8390b8f6ec1c1272021-05-30T04:30:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025184010.1371/journal.pone.0251840The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.Esther Jie TianSooraj VenugopalanSaravana KumarMatthew Beard<h4>Background</h4>While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date, much of the focus has been on evaluation of telehealth interventions within certain geographical contexts such as rural and remote communities. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence base to date for the impacts of, and outcomes from, telehealth delivered in prisons.<h4>Methods</h4>This systematic review was underpinned by best practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted to reinforce the literature selection process. The modified McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was undertaken.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-nine quantitative studies were included. Telehealth interventions were greatly varied in terms of types of healthcare services, implementation process and intervention parameters. Methodological concerns such as rigour in data collection and analysis, and psychometric properties of outcome measures were commonly identified. Process-related outcomes and telehealth outcomes were the two overarching categories identified.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This systematic review provides mixed evidence on the impact of, and outcomes from, telehealth in prisons. While the evidence base does highlight some positive impacts of telehealth, which at the least, is as effective as conventional care while achieving patient satisfaction, it is also important to consider the local context and drivers that may influence what, when and how telehealth services are provided. Addressing critical factors throughout the lifecycle of telehealth is equally important for successful implementation and sustainability.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251840 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Esther Jie Tian Sooraj Venugopalan Saravana Kumar Matthew Beard |
spellingShingle |
Esther Jie Tian Sooraj Venugopalan Saravana Kumar Matthew Beard The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Esther Jie Tian Sooraj Venugopalan Saravana Kumar Matthew Beard |
author_sort |
Esther Jie Tian |
title |
The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review. |
title_short |
The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review. |
title_full |
The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review. |
title_fullStr |
The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review. |
title_sort |
impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: a systematic review. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date, much of the focus has been on evaluation of telehealth interventions within certain geographical contexts such as rural and remote communities. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence base to date for the impacts of, and outcomes from, telehealth delivered in prisons.<h4>Methods</h4>This systematic review was underpinned by best practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted to reinforce the literature selection process. The modified McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was undertaken.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-nine quantitative studies were included. Telehealth interventions were greatly varied in terms of types of healthcare services, implementation process and intervention parameters. Methodological concerns such as rigour in data collection and analysis, and psychometric properties of outcome measures were commonly identified. Process-related outcomes and telehealth outcomes were the two overarching categories identified.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This systematic review provides mixed evidence on the impact of, and outcomes from, telehealth in prisons. While the evidence base does highlight some positive impacts of telehealth, which at the least, is as effective as conventional care while achieving patient satisfaction, it is also important to consider the local context and drivers that may influence what, when and how telehealth services are provided. Addressing critical factors throughout the lifecycle of telehealth is equally important for successful implementation and sustainability. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251840 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT estherjietian theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT soorajvenugopalan theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT saravanakumar theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT matthewbeard theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT estherjietian impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT soorajvenugopalan impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT saravanakumar impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview AT matthewbeard impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1721421162137780224 |