The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esther Jie Tian, Sooraj Venugopalan, Saravana Kumar, Matthew Beard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251840
id doaj-10884f2639314e90a8390b8f6ec1c127
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10884f2639314e90a8390b8f6ec1c1272021-05-30T04:30:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025184010.1371/journal.pone.0251840The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.Esther Jie TianSooraj VenugopalanSaravana KumarMatthew Beard<h4>Background</h4>While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date, much of the focus has been on evaluation of telehealth interventions within certain geographical contexts such as rural and remote communities. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence base to date for the impacts of, and outcomes from, telehealth delivered in prisons.<h4>Methods</h4>This systematic review was underpinned by best practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted to reinforce the literature selection process. The modified McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was undertaken.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-nine quantitative studies were included. Telehealth interventions were greatly varied in terms of types of healthcare services, implementation process and intervention parameters. Methodological concerns such as rigour in data collection and analysis, and psychometric properties of outcome measures were commonly identified. Process-related outcomes and telehealth outcomes were the two overarching categories identified.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This systematic review provides mixed evidence on the impact of, and outcomes from, telehealth in prisons. While the evidence base does highlight some positive impacts of telehealth, which at the least, is as effective as conventional care while achieving patient satisfaction, it is also important to consider the local context and drivers that may influence what, when and how telehealth services are provided. Addressing critical factors throughout the lifecycle of telehealth is equally important for successful implementation and sustainability.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251840
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esther Jie Tian
Sooraj Venugopalan
Saravana Kumar
Matthew Beard
spellingShingle Esther Jie Tian
Sooraj Venugopalan
Saravana Kumar
Matthew Beard
The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Esther Jie Tian
Sooraj Venugopalan
Saravana Kumar
Matthew Beard
author_sort Esther Jie Tian
title The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
title_short The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
title_full The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
title_fullStr The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.
title_sort impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: a systematic review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date, much of the focus has been on evaluation of telehealth interventions within certain geographical contexts such as rural and remote communities. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence base to date for the impacts of, and outcomes from, telehealth delivered in prisons.<h4>Methods</h4>This systematic review was underpinned by best practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted to reinforce the literature selection process. The modified McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was undertaken.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-nine quantitative studies were included. Telehealth interventions were greatly varied in terms of types of healthcare services, implementation process and intervention parameters. Methodological concerns such as rigour in data collection and analysis, and psychometric properties of outcome measures were commonly identified. Process-related outcomes and telehealth outcomes were the two overarching categories identified.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This systematic review provides mixed evidence on the impact of, and outcomes from, telehealth in prisons. While the evidence base does highlight some positive impacts of telehealth, which at the least, is as effective as conventional care while achieving patient satisfaction, it is also important to consider the local context and drivers that may influence what, when and how telehealth services are provided. Addressing critical factors throughout the lifecycle of telehealth is equally important for successful implementation and sustainability.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251840
work_keys_str_mv AT estherjietian theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT soorajvenugopalan theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT saravanakumar theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT matthewbeard theimpactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT estherjietian impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT soorajvenugopalan impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT saravanakumar impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
AT matthewbeard impactsofandoutcomesfromtelehealthdeliveredinprisonsasystematicreview
_version_ 1721421162137780224