PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA

The paper examines the placebo effect in sports performance. The possibility that the placebo effect is a more common phenomenon than the quantity of published research would suggest is briefly addressed. It is suggested that the placebo control design often used in sports performance research masks...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christopher J. Beedie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Uludag 2007-03-01
Series:Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jssm.org/vol6/n1/2/v6n1-2text.php
id doaj-106b672f74b94ec390461192fdd6dda0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-106b672f74b94ec390461192fdd6dda02020-11-24T22:17:10ZengUniversity of UludagJournal of Sports Science and Medicine1303-29682007-03-01612128PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATAChristopher J. BeedieThe paper examines the placebo effect in sports performance. The possibility that the placebo effect is a more common phenomenon than the quantity of published research would suggest is briefly addressed. It is suggested that the placebo control design often used in sports performance research masks any placebo effects and thus presents a false picture of the mechanisms underlying performance-enhancing interventions in the real world. An electronic survey was sent to 48 competitive, international and professional athletes. Questions related to the placebo effect in competitive sport. Thirty responses were received. Data indicate that the majority (97%) of respondents believe that the placebo effect can exert an influence on sports performance, and that a significant number (73%) have experienced what they defined as a placebo effect. Inductive content analysis reveals that these experiences fall into several categories such as explicit placebo effects, inadvertent false beliefs, ritual and reverse placebo effects. Furthermore, 10 respondents (33%) offer explanations as to the nature of the placebo effect. Again, inductive content analysis reveals that these explanations fall into several categories including deliberate changes in competitive strategy, belief/expectancy, faith in a third party, and marketing. Overall, responses support previous experimental research and anecdotal reports that have found a relationship between belief and sports performance. It is suggested that further research be structured to not simply control for the placebo effect, but to elucidate ithttp://www.jssm.org/vol6/n1/2/v6n1-2text.phpBeliefexperimental designperformance psychologyresearch methods
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher J. Beedie
spellingShingle Christopher J. Beedie
PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Belief
experimental design
performance psychology
research methods
author_facet Christopher J. Beedie
author_sort Christopher J. Beedie
title PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA
title_short PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA
title_full PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA
title_fullStr PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA
title_full_unstemmed PLACEBO EFFECTS IN COMPETITIVE SPORT: QUALITATIVE DATA
title_sort placebo effects in competitive sport: qualitative data
publisher University of Uludag
series Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
issn 1303-2968
publishDate 2007-03-01
description The paper examines the placebo effect in sports performance. The possibility that the placebo effect is a more common phenomenon than the quantity of published research would suggest is briefly addressed. It is suggested that the placebo control design often used in sports performance research masks any placebo effects and thus presents a false picture of the mechanisms underlying performance-enhancing interventions in the real world. An electronic survey was sent to 48 competitive, international and professional athletes. Questions related to the placebo effect in competitive sport. Thirty responses were received. Data indicate that the majority (97%) of respondents believe that the placebo effect can exert an influence on sports performance, and that a significant number (73%) have experienced what they defined as a placebo effect. Inductive content analysis reveals that these experiences fall into several categories such as explicit placebo effects, inadvertent false beliefs, ritual and reverse placebo effects. Furthermore, 10 respondents (33%) offer explanations as to the nature of the placebo effect. Again, inductive content analysis reveals that these explanations fall into several categories including deliberate changes in competitive strategy, belief/expectancy, faith in a third party, and marketing. Overall, responses support previous experimental research and anecdotal reports that have found a relationship between belief and sports performance. It is suggested that further research be structured to not simply control for the placebo effect, but to elucidate it
topic Belief
experimental design
performance psychology
research methods
url http://www.jssm.org/vol6/n1/2/v6n1-2text.php
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjbeedie placeboeffectsincompetitivesportqualitativedata
_version_ 1725786285860192256