Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Systematic reviews are used to inform healthcare decision making. In reviews that aim to examine the effects of organisational, policy change or public health interventions, or exposures, evidence from interrupted time series (ITS) studies may be included. A core component of many system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Korevaar, Amalia Karahalios, Andrew B. Forbes, Simon L. Turner, Steve McDonald, Monica Taljaard, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Allen C. Cheng, Lisa Bero, Joanne E. McKenzie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2020-07-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/9-110/v2
id doaj-1069783d5be5431daceb2e178b24a46f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1069783d5be5431daceb2e178b24a46f2020-11-25T03:59:53ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022020-07-01910.12688/f1000research.22226.227594Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]Elizabeth Korevaar0Amalia Karahalios1Andrew B. Forbes2Simon L. Turner3Steve McDonald4Monica Taljaard5Jeremy M. Grimshaw6Allen C. Cheng7Lisa Bero8Joanne E. McKenzie9School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, CanadaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, CanadaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine and Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, AustraliaBackground: Systematic reviews are used to inform healthcare decision making. In reviews that aim to examine the effects of organisational, policy change or public health interventions, or exposures, evidence from interrupted time series (ITS) studies may be included. A core component of many systematic reviews is meta-analysis, which is the statistical synthesis of results across studies. There is currently a lack of guidance informing the choice of meta-analysis methods for combining results from ITS studies, and there have been no studies examining the meta-analysis methods used in practice. This study therefore aims to describe current meta-analysis methods used in a cohort of reviews of ITS studies. Methods: We will identify the 100 most recent reviews (published between 1 January 2000 and 11 October 2019) that include meta-analyses of ITS studies from a search of eight electronic databases covering several disciplines (public health, psychology, education, economics). Study selection will be undertaken independently by two authors. Data extraction will be undertaken by one author, and for a random sample of the reviews, two authors. From eligible reviews we will extract details at the review level including discipline, type of interruption and any tools used to assess the risk of bias / methodological quality of included ITS studies; at the meta-analytic level we will extract type of outcome, effect measure(s), meta-analytic methods, and any methods used to re-analyse the individual ITS studies. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise the data. Conclusions: This review will describe the methods used to meta-analyse results from ITS studies. Results from this review will inform future methods research examining how different meta-analysis methods perform, and ultimately, the development of guidance.https://f1000research.com/articles/9-110/v2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth Korevaar
Amalia Karahalios
Andrew B. Forbes
Simon L. Turner
Steve McDonald
Monica Taljaard
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Allen C. Cheng
Lisa Bero
Joanne E. McKenzie
spellingShingle Elizabeth Korevaar
Amalia Karahalios
Andrew B. Forbes
Simon L. Turner
Steve McDonald
Monica Taljaard
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Allen C. Cheng
Lisa Bero
Joanne E. McKenzie
Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
F1000Research
author_facet Elizabeth Korevaar
Amalia Karahalios
Andrew B. Forbes
Simon L. Turner
Steve McDonald
Monica Taljaard
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Allen C. Cheng
Lisa Bero
Joanne E. McKenzie
author_sort Elizabeth Korevaar
title Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_short Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_full Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_fullStr Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_full_unstemmed Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_sort methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: a methodological systematic review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Background: Systematic reviews are used to inform healthcare decision making. In reviews that aim to examine the effects of organisational, policy change or public health interventions, or exposures, evidence from interrupted time series (ITS) studies may be included. A core component of many systematic reviews is meta-analysis, which is the statistical synthesis of results across studies. There is currently a lack of guidance informing the choice of meta-analysis methods for combining results from ITS studies, and there have been no studies examining the meta-analysis methods used in practice. This study therefore aims to describe current meta-analysis methods used in a cohort of reviews of ITS studies. Methods: We will identify the 100 most recent reviews (published between 1 January 2000 and 11 October 2019) that include meta-analyses of ITS studies from a search of eight electronic databases covering several disciplines (public health, psychology, education, economics). Study selection will be undertaken independently by two authors. Data extraction will be undertaken by one author, and for a random sample of the reviews, two authors. From eligible reviews we will extract details at the review level including discipline, type of interruption and any tools used to assess the risk of bias / methodological quality of included ITS studies; at the meta-analytic level we will extract type of outcome, effect measure(s), meta-analytic methods, and any methods used to re-analyse the individual ITS studies. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise the data. Conclusions: This review will describe the methods used to meta-analyse results from ITS studies. Results from this review will inform future methods research examining how different meta-analysis methods perform, and ultimately, the development of guidance.
url https://f1000research.com/articles/9-110/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethkorevaar methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT amaliakarahalios methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT andrewbforbes methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT simonlturner methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT stevemcdonald methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT monicataljaard methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT jeremymgrimshaw methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT allenccheng methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT lisabero methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT joanneemckenzie methodsusedtometaanalyseresultsfrominterruptedtimeseriesstudiesamethodologicalsystematicreviewprotocolversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
_version_ 1724452358948126720