Winner Strategies in Crisis

Research background: Since the publication of Markowitz’ Portfolio Selection Theory, researchers and practitioners have been searching for the optimal structure of investment portfolios. An unlimited number of portfolio-based investment strategies have been created since 1952. However, none of these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Langenstein Laura, Užík Martin, Warias Roman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/03/shsconf_glob20_03015.pdf
id doaj-10659f42306b4339b004dcc3eac19b53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10659f42306b4339b004dcc3eac19b532021-01-15T10:21:08ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242021-01-01920301510.1051/shsconf/20219203015shsconf_glob20_03015Winner Strategies in CrisisLangenstein Laura0Užík Martin1Warias Roman2Laura Langenstein is a graduate Master of Science from the University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf and works as a Digital Marketing Officer at e.bootis AG EssenProf. Dr. Martin Užík earned his PhD and Habilitation at the University of Wuppertal and holds a professorship in the field of finance at the Berlin School of Economics and LawRoman Warias is a doctoral student at the Technical University Košice and works as a manager at Warias Steuerberatungs- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, an office for financial services and lawResearch background: Since the publication of Markowitz’ Portfolio Selection Theory, researchers and practitioners have been searching for the optimal structure of investment portfolios. An unlimited number of portfolio-based investment strategies have been created since 1952. However, none of these strategies seem to continuously generate overperformance over a long time period. This may also be due to the strong dynamics of economic development and other external factors. Purpose of the article: The aim of this article is to analyze which strategies are successful in generating winning portfolios in times of crisis. Three types of crises are considered: first, the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2001, second, the financial crisis of 2008, and finally, the performance impact of the corona crisis. Methods: The data of the S&P 500 and STOXX Europe 600 companies are analyzed. The first step is the statistical review of the performance of companies in different periods with the focus on the analysis of the crisis years. Subsequently, the formation of portfolios is carried out according to known key figures such as high-low PE ratio, high-low market-to-book ratio, and others. In the form of a regression analysis, selected fundamental data are used to statistically check their relevance for performance. Findings & Value added: The results shows that all crises have similarities in certain factors. However, they also show that companies with a digital business model are able to manage crises better than those without a digital business model.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/03/shsconf_glob20_03015.pdfportfolio theoryinvestment in crisis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Langenstein Laura
Užík Martin
Warias Roman
spellingShingle Langenstein Laura
Užík Martin
Warias Roman
Winner Strategies in Crisis
SHS Web of Conferences
portfolio theory
investment in crisis
author_facet Langenstein Laura
Užík Martin
Warias Roman
author_sort Langenstein Laura
title Winner Strategies in Crisis
title_short Winner Strategies in Crisis
title_full Winner Strategies in Crisis
title_fullStr Winner Strategies in Crisis
title_full_unstemmed Winner Strategies in Crisis
title_sort winner strategies in crisis
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Research background: Since the publication of Markowitz’ Portfolio Selection Theory, researchers and practitioners have been searching for the optimal structure of investment portfolios. An unlimited number of portfolio-based investment strategies have been created since 1952. However, none of these strategies seem to continuously generate overperformance over a long time period. This may also be due to the strong dynamics of economic development and other external factors. Purpose of the article: The aim of this article is to analyze which strategies are successful in generating winning portfolios in times of crisis. Three types of crises are considered: first, the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2001, second, the financial crisis of 2008, and finally, the performance impact of the corona crisis. Methods: The data of the S&P 500 and STOXX Europe 600 companies are analyzed. The first step is the statistical review of the performance of companies in different periods with the focus on the analysis of the crisis years. Subsequently, the formation of portfolios is carried out according to known key figures such as high-low PE ratio, high-low market-to-book ratio, and others. In the form of a regression analysis, selected fundamental data are used to statistically check their relevance for performance. Findings & Value added: The results shows that all crises have similarities in certain factors. However, they also show that companies with a digital business model are able to manage crises better than those without a digital business model.
topic portfolio theory
investment in crisis
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/03/shsconf_glob20_03015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT langensteinlaura winnerstrategiesincrisis
AT uzikmartin winnerstrategiesincrisis
AT wariasroman winnerstrategiesincrisis
_version_ 1724337255530627072