Parents’ Expressions of Concerns and Hopes for the Future and Their Concomitant Assessments of Disability in Their Children

Aim: To assess parents’ ability to express their concerns and hopes for the future in their children with disability and assess their children’s disability as well as to analyse these data for consistency. Method: Parents of 162 children with spina bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular disorders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niels Ove Illum, Mette Bonderup, Kim Oren Gradel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-06-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Pediatrics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556518784948
Description
Summary:Aim: To assess parents’ ability to express their concerns and hopes for the future in their children with disability and assess their children’s disability as well as to analyse these data for consistency. Method: Parents of 162 children with spina bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular disorders, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, hearing impairment, mental disability, or disability following brain tumours were asked to freely express their concerns and hopes for the future and to assess disability in their own children by employing a set of 26 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) body function (b) codes and activity and participation (d) codes. A grounded theory approach was employed to systematize parents’ expressions of concerns and hopes; then, parents scored qualifiers on a 5-step qualitative Likert scale. Parents assessed their children’s disability in the same way using the ICF-CY 5-step qualifier scale. Results: Altogether, 119 parents freely expressed their concerns and hopes, and 101 of them also assessed their children’s disability using the 26 ICF-CY codes. A total of 475 expressions of concern and hopes (issues) were expressed and categorized into 34 areas of concern and hopes (subsections). The most frequently mentioned issues were education; understanding, goodwill, and communication between parents; and community support. Qualitative data on both 5-step qualifier scales showed good reliability. Rasch analysis maps on concerns and hopes for children as well as on the ICF-CY assessment demonstrated good alignment and a clinically relevant progression from the least to the most disabled children. Conclusion: Parents can express valid and reliable data on their concerns and hopes for the future and can reliably assess disability in their own children.
ISSN:1179-5565