Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All
The orientation of a magneto and inertial measurement unit (MIMU) is estimated by means of sensor fusion algorithms (SFAs) thus enabling human motion tracking. However, despite several SFAs implementations proposed over the last decades, there is still a lack of consensus about the best performing S...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/7/2543 |
id |
doaj-1043340ad6c349e0809a4d02e54cc14e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1043340ad6c349e0809a4d02e54cc14e2021-04-05T23:01:39ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-04-01212543254310.3390/s21072543Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit AllMarco Caruso0Angelo Maria Sabatini1Daniel Laidig2Thomas Seel3Marco Knaflitz4Ugo Della Croce5Andrea Cereatti6PolitoBIOMed Lab—Biomedical Engineering Lab and Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Excellence in Robotics & AI, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, ItalyControl Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, GermanyControl Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, GermanyPolitoBIOMed Lab—Biomedical Engineering Lab and Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, ItalyPolitoBIOMed Lab—Biomedical Engineering Lab and Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, ItalyThe orientation of a magneto and inertial measurement unit (MIMU) is estimated by means of sensor fusion algorithms (SFAs) thus enabling human motion tracking. However, despite several SFAs implementations proposed over the last decades, there is still a lack of consensus about the best performing SFAs and their accuracy. As suggested by recent literature, the filter parameters play a central role in determining the orientation errors. The aim of this work is to analyze the accuracy of ten SFAs while running under the best possible conditions (i.e., their parameter values are set using the orientation reference) in nine experimental scenarios including three rotation rates and three commercial products. The main finding is that parameter values must be specific for each SFA according to the experimental scenario to avoid errors comparable to those obtained when the default parameter values are used. Overall, when optimally tuned, no statistically significant differences are observed among the different SFAs in all tested experimental scenarios and the absolute errors are included between 3.8 deg and 7.1 deg. Increasing the rotation rate generally leads to a significant performance worsening. Errors are also influenced by the MIMU commercial model. SFA MATLAB implementations have been made available online.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/7/2543MIMUorientation estimationfilter parametersfilter comparisonwearable sensorssensor fusion |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marco Caruso Angelo Maria Sabatini Daniel Laidig Thomas Seel Marco Knaflitz Ugo Della Croce Andrea Cereatti |
spellingShingle |
Marco Caruso Angelo Maria Sabatini Daniel Laidig Thomas Seel Marco Knaflitz Ugo Della Croce Andrea Cereatti Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All Sensors MIMU orientation estimation filter parameters filter comparison wearable sensors sensor fusion |
author_facet |
Marco Caruso Angelo Maria Sabatini Daniel Laidig Thomas Seel Marco Knaflitz Ugo Della Croce Andrea Cereatti |
author_sort |
Marco Caruso |
title |
Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All |
title_short |
Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All |
title_full |
Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the Accuracy of Ten Algorithms for Orientation Estimation Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Under Optimal Conditions: One Size Does Not Fit All |
title_sort |
analysis of the accuracy of ten algorithms for orientation estimation using inertial and magnetic sensing under optimal conditions: one size does not fit all |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The orientation of a magneto and inertial measurement unit (MIMU) is estimated by means of sensor fusion algorithms (SFAs) thus enabling human motion tracking. However, despite several SFAs implementations proposed over the last decades, there is still a lack of consensus about the best performing SFAs and their accuracy. As suggested by recent literature, the filter parameters play a central role in determining the orientation errors. The aim of this work is to analyze the accuracy of ten SFAs while running under the best possible conditions (i.e., their parameter values are set using the orientation reference) in nine experimental scenarios including three rotation rates and three commercial products. The main finding is that parameter values must be specific for each SFA according to the experimental scenario to avoid errors comparable to those obtained when the default parameter values are used. Overall, when optimally tuned, no statistically significant differences are observed among the different SFAs in all tested experimental scenarios and the absolute errors are included between 3.8 deg and 7.1 deg. Increasing the rotation rate generally leads to a significant performance worsening. Errors are also influenced by the MIMU commercial model. SFA MATLAB implementations have been made available online. |
topic |
MIMU orientation estimation filter parameters filter comparison wearable sensors sensor fusion |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/7/2543 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcocaruso analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall AT angelomariasabatini analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall AT daniellaidig analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall AT thomasseel analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall AT marcoknaflitz analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall AT ugodellacroce analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall AT andreacereatti analysisoftheaccuracyoftenalgorithmsfororientationestimationusinginertialandmagneticsensingunderoptimalconditionsonesizedoesnotfitall |
_version_ |
1721538753268285440 |