Meta-analysis of medical management versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
Several observational studies have shown a survival benefit for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are treated with catheter ablation (CA) rather than medical management (MM). However, data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are uncertain. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of RCT...
Main Author: | Yin-jun Mao, Hang Wang, Jian-xing Chen, Pin-fang Huang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IMR (Innovative Medical Research) Press Limited
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rcm.imrpress.com/fileup/2153-8174/PDF/1601433279773-1473866977.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
by: Andre J. Gauri, et al.
Published: (2003-10-01) -
Catheter, surgical, or hybrid procedure: what future for atrial fibrillation ablation?
by: Giuseppe Nasso, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Past, present, and future directions
by: Kentaro Yoshida, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01) -
Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
by: Chi Keong Ching, MD, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01) -
Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis
by: Honglan Ma, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)