Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.

Legionella is a gram-negative bacterium that can cause Pontiac fever, a mild upper respiratory infection and Legionnaire’s disease, a more severe illness. We aimed to compare the performance of urine antigen, culture and PCR test methods and to determine if sputum is an alternative to the use of mor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adriana Peci, Anne-Luise Winter, Jonathan B. Gubbay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
PCR
BAL
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00175/full
id doaj-1017ded906b744969375bc16dcac38cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1017ded906b744969375bc16dcac38cc2020-11-25T01:01:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652016-08-01410.3389/fpubh.2016.00175214734Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.Adriana Peci0Anne-Luise Winter1Jonathan B. Gubbay2PHOPHOPHOLegionella is a gram-negative bacterium that can cause Pontiac fever, a mild upper respiratory infection and Legionnaire’s disease, a more severe illness. We aimed to compare the performance of urine antigen, culture and PCR test methods and to determine if sputum is an alternative to the use of more invasive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Data for this study included specimens tested for Legionella at PHOL from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2014, as part of routine clinical testing. We found sensitivity of UAT compared to culture to be 87%, specificity 94.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) 63.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.5%. Sensitivity of UAT compared to PCR was 74.7%, specificity 98.3%, PPV 77.7% and NPV 98.1%. Of 146 patients who had a Legionella positive result by PCR, only 66(45.2%) also had a positive result by culture. Sensitivity for culture was the same using either sputum or BAL (13.6%); sensitivity for PCR was 10.3% for sputum and 12.8% for BAL. Both sputum and BAL yield similar results despite testing methods (Fisher Exact p-values=1.0, for each test). In summary, all test methods have inherent weaknesses in identifying Legionella; thereforemore than one testing method should be used. Obtaining a single specimen type from patients with pneumonia limits the ability to diagnose Legionella, particularly when urine is the specimen type submitted. Given ease of collection, and similar sensitivity to BAL, clinicians are encouraged to submit sputum in addition to urine when BAL submission is not practical, from patients being tested for Legionella.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00175/fullLegionellaSputumPCRcultureBALUrine antigen
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adriana Peci
Anne-Luise Winter
Jonathan B. Gubbay
spellingShingle Adriana Peci
Anne-Luise Winter
Jonathan B. Gubbay
Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.
Frontiers in Public Health
Legionella
Sputum
PCR
culture
BAL
Urine antigen
author_facet Adriana Peci
Anne-Luise Winter
Jonathan B. Gubbay
author_sort Adriana Peci
title Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.
title_short Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.
title_full Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.
title_fullStr Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time PCR, for Legionella detection in clinical specimens.
title_sort evaluation and comparison of multiple test methods, including real-time pcr, for legionella detection in clinical specimens.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Public Health
issn 2296-2565
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Legionella is a gram-negative bacterium that can cause Pontiac fever, a mild upper respiratory infection and Legionnaire’s disease, a more severe illness. We aimed to compare the performance of urine antigen, culture and PCR test methods and to determine if sputum is an alternative to the use of more invasive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Data for this study included specimens tested for Legionella at PHOL from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2014, as part of routine clinical testing. We found sensitivity of UAT compared to culture to be 87%, specificity 94.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) 63.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.5%. Sensitivity of UAT compared to PCR was 74.7%, specificity 98.3%, PPV 77.7% and NPV 98.1%. Of 146 patients who had a Legionella positive result by PCR, only 66(45.2%) also had a positive result by culture. Sensitivity for culture was the same using either sputum or BAL (13.6%); sensitivity for PCR was 10.3% for sputum and 12.8% for BAL. Both sputum and BAL yield similar results despite testing methods (Fisher Exact p-values=1.0, for each test). In summary, all test methods have inherent weaknesses in identifying Legionella; thereforemore than one testing method should be used. Obtaining a single specimen type from patients with pneumonia limits the ability to diagnose Legionella, particularly when urine is the specimen type submitted. Given ease of collection, and similar sensitivity to BAL, clinicians are encouraged to submit sputum in addition to urine when BAL submission is not practical, from patients being tested for Legionella.
topic Legionella
Sputum
PCR
culture
BAL
Urine antigen
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00175/full
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianapeci evaluationandcomparisonofmultipletestmethodsincludingrealtimepcrforlegionelladetectioninclinicalspecimens
AT anneluisewinter evaluationandcomparisonofmultipletestmethodsincludingrealtimepcrforlegionelladetectioninclinicalspecimens
AT jonathanbgubbay evaluationandcomparisonofmultipletestmethodsincludingrealtimepcrforlegionelladetectioninclinicalspecimens
_version_ 1725210671249883136