Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils

An EOR study has been performed applying miscible CO2 flooding and compared with that for water flooding. Three different oils are used, reference oil (n-decane), model oil (n-C10, SA, toluene and 0.35 wt % asphaltene) and crude oil (10 wt % asphaltene) obtained from the Middle East. Stearic acid (S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edwin A. Chukwudeme, Aly A. Hamouda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2009-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
CO2
EOR
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/2/3/714/
id doaj-10151fd4c8e347feaaced2965bf6102d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10151fd4c8e347feaaced2965bf6102d2020-11-24T22:11:25ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732009-09-012371473710.3390/en20300714Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic OilsEdwin A. ChukwudemeAly A. HamoudaAn EOR study has been performed applying miscible CO2 flooding and compared with that for water flooding. Three different oils are used, reference oil (n-decane), model oil (n-C10, SA, toluene and 0.35 wt % asphaltene) and crude oil (10 wt % asphaltene) obtained from the Middle East. Stearic acid (SA) is added representing a natural surfactant in oil. For the non-asphaltenic oil, miscible CO2 flooding is shown to be more favourable than that by water. However, it is interesting to see that for first years after the start of the injection (< 3 years) it is shown that there is almost no difference between the recovered oils by water and CO2, after which (> 3 years) oil recovery by gas injection showed a significant increase. This may be due to the enhanced performance at the increased reservoir pressure during the first period. Maximum oil recovery is shown by miscible CO2 flooding of asphaltenic oil at combined temperatures and pressures of 50 °C/90 bar and 70 °C/120 bar (no significant difference between the two cases, about 1%) compared to 80 °C/140 bar. This may support the positive influence of the high combined temperatures and pressures for the miscible CO2 flooding; however beyond a certain limit the oil recovery declined due to increased asphaltene deposition. Another interesting finding in this work is that for single phase oil, an almost linear relationship is observed between the pressure drop and the asphaltene deposition regardless of the flowing fluid pressure. http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/2/3/714/EOR miscible CO2asphaltenerelative permeabilitypressure dropwettabilityCO2EORmobility ratiorelative permeability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edwin A. Chukwudeme
Aly A. Hamouda
spellingShingle Edwin A. Chukwudeme
Aly A. Hamouda
Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils
Energies
EOR miscible CO2
asphaltene
relative permeability
pressure drop
wettability
CO2
EOR
mobility ratio
relative permeability
author_facet Edwin A. Chukwudeme
Aly A. Hamouda
author_sort Edwin A. Chukwudeme
title Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils
title_short Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils
title_full Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils
title_fullStr Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Miscible CO2 and Water Flooding of Asphaltenic and Non-Asphaltenic Oils
title_sort enhanced oil recovery (eor) by miscible co2 and water flooding of asphaltenic and non-asphaltenic oils
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2009-09-01
description An EOR study has been performed applying miscible CO2 flooding and compared with that for water flooding. Three different oils are used, reference oil (n-decane), model oil (n-C10, SA, toluene and 0.35 wt % asphaltene) and crude oil (10 wt % asphaltene) obtained from the Middle East. Stearic acid (SA) is added representing a natural surfactant in oil. For the non-asphaltenic oil, miscible CO2 flooding is shown to be more favourable than that by water. However, it is interesting to see that for first years after the start of the injection (< 3 years) it is shown that there is almost no difference between the recovered oils by water and CO2, after which (> 3 years) oil recovery by gas injection showed a significant increase. This may be due to the enhanced performance at the increased reservoir pressure during the first period. Maximum oil recovery is shown by miscible CO2 flooding of asphaltenic oil at combined temperatures and pressures of 50 °C/90 bar and 70 °C/120 bar (no significant difference between the two cases, about 1%) compared to 80 °C/140 bar. This may support the positive influence of the high combined temperatures and pressures for the miscible CO2 flooding; however beyond a certain limit the oil recovery declined due to increased asphaltene deposition. Another interesting finding in this work is that for single phase oil, an almost linear relationship is observed between the pressure drop and the asphaltene deposition regardless of the flowing fluid pressure.
topic EOR miscible CO2
asphaltene
relative permeability
pressure drop
wettability
CO2
EOR
mobility ratio
relative permeability
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/2/3/714/
work_keys_str_mv AT edwinachukwudeme enhancedoilrecoveryeorbymiscibleco2andwaterfloodingofasphaltenicandnonasphaltenicoils
AT alyahamouda enhancedoilrecoveryeorbymiscibleco2andwaterfloodingofasphaltenicandnonasphaltenicoils
_version_ 1725805787520958464