Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique

Background:. Breast animation deformity has sparked a reappraisal of the prepectoral implant placement in breast reconstruction. Our approach for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DIR) has evolved from a dual plane muscle/mesh coverage to a simple prepectoral hammock covering just the inferol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gudjon L. Gunnarsson, MD, Jorn Bo Thomsen, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2018-10-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001931
id doaj-1014ec83b5e14f54b8fccf48868a33cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1014ec83b5e14f54b8fccf48868a33cc2020-11-24T20:57:12ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742018-10-01610e193110.1097/GOX.0000000000001931201810000-00002Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on TechniqueGudjon L. Gunnarsson, MD0Jorn Bo Thomsen, MD, PhD1From the *Department of Plastic Surgery, Telemark Hospital, Norway†Odense University Hospital and Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, DenmarkBackground:. Breast animation deformity has sparked a reappraisal of the prepectoral implant placement in breast reconstruction. Our approach for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DIR) has evolved from a dual plane muscle/mesh coverage to a simple prepectoral hammock covering just the inferolateral part of the implant without the muscle. The aim of this study was to test the procedure in a prospective case series with emphasis on reconstructive outcome. Methods:. Twenty-seven patients undergoing nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy without subsequent radiation therapy requesting a primary implant-based reconstruction were included from May 2016 to April 2017. Median age was 46 years (25–67). We registered comorbidities, complications, and long-term results of successful or failed reconstruction. Results:. Forty-seven DIR in 27 women, 20 bilateral, 7 unilateral. The median body mass index was 24 (17–31). The median time for mastectomy and DIR was 103 minutes (60–150). The inferolateral hammock consisted of Meso Biomatrix (34), Strattice (11), and Vicryl (2). The median implant size was 260 cc (140–345). Four complications (14%), 2 hematomas, 1 seroma, and 1 infection with partial nipple necrosis were all salvaged and reconstruction completed successfully. The median follow-up was 11 months (7–17). Conclusion:. The prepectoral inferolateral hammock, a swift one-stage procedure with a quick recovery, creates promising results in the presence of an adequate skin flap. The simplicity of the method has made it the authors first choice for DIR.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001931
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gudjon L. Gunnarsson, MD
Jorn Bo Thomsen, MD, PhD
spellingShingle Gudjon L. Gunnarsson, MD
Jorn Bo Thomsen, MD, PhD
Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Gudjon L. Gunnarsson, MD
Jorn Bo Thomsen, MD, PhD
author_sort Gudjon L. Gunnarsson, MD
title Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
title_short Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
title_full Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
title_fullStr Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
title_full_unstemmed Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
title_sort prepectoral hammock and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction in 10 minutes: a focus on technique
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Background:. Breast animation deformity has sparked a reappraisal of the prepectoral implant placement in breast reconstruction. Our approach for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DIR) has evolved from a dual plane muscle/mesh coverage to a simple prepectoral hammock covering just the inferolateral part of the implant without the muscle. The aim of this study was to test the procedure in a prospective case series with emphasis on reconstructive outcome. Methods:. Twenty-seven patients undergoing nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy without subsequent radiation therapy requesting a primary implant-based reconstruction were included from May 2016 to April 2017. Median age was 46 years (25–67). We registered comorbidities, complications, and long-term results of successful or failed reconstruction. Results:. Forty-seven DIR in 27 women, 20 bilateral, 7 unilateral. The median body mass index was 24 (17–31). The median time for mastectomy and DIR was 103 minutes (60–150). The inferolateral hammock consisted of Meso Biomatrix (34), Strattice (11), and Vicryl (2). The median implant size was 260 cc (140–345). Four complications (14%), 2 hematomas, 1 seroma, and 1 infection with partial nipple necrosis were all salvaged and reconstruction completed successfully. The median follow-up was 11 months (7–17). Conclusion:. The prepectoral inferolateral hammock, a swift one-stage procedure with a quick recovery, creates promising results in the presence of an adequate skin flap. The simplicity of the method has made it the authors first choice for DIR.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001931
work_keys_str_mv AT gudjonlgunnarssonmd prepectoralhammockanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstructionin10minutesafocusontechnique
AT jornbothomsenmdphd prepectoralhammockanddirecttoimplantbreastreconstructionin10minutesafocusontechnique
_version_ 1716788555185913856