Is minimally invasive surgery superior to open surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review the updated evidence comparing outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional open surgery (COS) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2005 to August 2016 were iden...
Main Authors: | Karen Ka Man Ng, Jason Pui Yin Cheung |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017716254 |
Similar Items
-
Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery
by: Kevin Y. Chang, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
On Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
by: Försth, Peter
Published: (2015) -
Minimal Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
by: Victor Popov, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Techniques of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
by: Gabriel Iacob, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
by: Ju-Eun Kim, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)