Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?

An elevated heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the “f” current in the sinus node and reduces heart rate without any modifications of blood pressure, myocardial contractility and arteriolar resistance. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gian Piero Perna, Fabio Vagnarelli, Maurizio Volterrani, Ilaria Battistoni, Claudio Rapezzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-12-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865415300247
id doaj-100708e70fb44a54a29ae5ea89099cc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-100708e70fb44a54a29ae5ea89099cc02020-11-24T22:35:52ZengElsevierContemporary Clinical Trials Communications2451-86542016-12-014C586310.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.003Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?Gian Piero Perna0Fabio Vagnarelli1Maurizio Volterrani2Ilaria Battistoni3Claudio Rapezzi4Cardiology, Cardiovascular Department, “Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona”, Ancona, ItalyCardiology, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyCardiology, “San Raffaele Hospital”, Roma, ItalyCardiology, Cardiovascular Department, “Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona”, Ancona, ItalyCardiology, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyAn elevated heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the “f” current in the sinus node and reduces heart rate without any modifications of blood pressure, myocardial contractility and arteriolar resistance. However the addition of ivabradine to standard therapy to reduce heart rate did not improve outcomes in the recent SIGNIFY trial. Moreover, a significant interaction between the effect of ivabradine among subgroups with and without angina was detected, with a worse outcome in patients in CCS class >II at baseline. The explanation for this surprising finding despite a significant reduction in angina and myocardial revascularization procedures is uncertain. A J-curve for heart rate was not demonstrated. We speculate a significant interference on adverse events (mainly atrial fibrillation and consequently acute coronary syndromes) and on the outcome of unfavorable interactions between ivabradine and diltiazem, verapamil and strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (4.6% of the total population). Indeed, when these patients are excluded from subgroup analysis, the harmful effect of Ivabradine among patients with severe angina disappears. In conclusion, heart rate is a marker of risk but is not a risk factor and/or a target of therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular systolic function. Standard doses of ivabradine are indicated for treatment of angina as an alternative or in addition to beta-blockers, but should not be administered in association with CYP3A4 inhibitors or heart rate-lowering calcium-channel blockers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865415300247
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gian Piero Perna
Fabio Vagnarelli
Maurizio Volterrani
Ilaria Battistoni
Claudio Rapezzi
spellingShingle Gian Piero Perna
Fabio Vagnarelli
Maurizio Volterrani
Ilaria Battistoni
Claudio Rapezzi
Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
author_facet Gian Piero Perna
Fabio Vagnarelli
Maurizio Volterrani
Ilaria Battistoni
Claudio Rapezzi
author_sort Gian Piero Perna
title Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_short Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_full Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_fullStr Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_full_unstemmed Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_sort heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: what we have already learned from signify?
publisher Elsevier
series Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
issn 2451-8654
publishDate 2016-12-01
description An elevated heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the “f” current in the sinus node and reduces heart rate without any modifications of blood pressure, myocardial contractility and arteriolar resistance. However the addition of ivabradine to standard therapy to reduce heart rate did not improve outcomes in the recent SIGNIFY trial. Moreover, a significant interaction between the effect of ivabradine among subgroups with and without angina was detected, with a worse outcome in patients in CCS class >II at baseline. The explanation for this surprising finding despite a significant reduction in angina and myocardial revascularization procedures is uncertain. A J-curve for heart rate was not demonstrated. We speculate a significant interference on adverse events (mainly atrial fibrillation and consequently acute coronary syndromes) and on the outcome of unfavorable interactions between ivabradine and diltiazem, verapamil and strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (4.6% of the total population). Indeed, when these patients are excluded from subgroup analysis, the harmful effect of Ivabradine among patients with severe angina disappears. In conclusion, heart rate is a marker of risk but is not a risk factor and/or a target of therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular systolic function. Standard doses of ivabradine are indicated for treatment of angina as an alternative or in addition to beta-blockers, but should not be administered in association with CYP3A4 inhibitors or heart rate-lowering calcium-channel blockers.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865415300247
work_keys_str_mv AT gianpieroperna heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT fabiovagnarelli heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT mauriziovolterrani heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT ilariabattistoni heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT claudiorapezzi heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
_version_ 1725722648769462272