DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey

Treatment and support of a child with DSD calls for experience and expertise in diagnosis, surgical techniques, understanding of psychosocial issues, and recognizing and accepting the significance of individual values of children, families, and support groups. The range of what is considered “approp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jürg C. Streuli, Birgit Köhler, Knut Werner-Rosen, Christine Mitchell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/185787
id doaj-100389700cdd408783615a6265181e41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-100389700cdd408783615a6265181e412020-11-24T20:47:16ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Urology1687-63691687-63772012-01-01201210.1155/2012/185787185787DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative SurveyJürg C. Streuli0Birgit Köhler1Knut Werner-Rosen2Christine Mitchell3Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistraße 24, 8032 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, University Children's Hospital, Charité, Humboldt University, 13353 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, University Children's Hospital, Charité, Humboldt University, 13353 Berlin, GermanyOffice of Ethics, Children's Hospital Boston Division of Medical Ethics, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USATreatment and support of a child with DSD calls for experience and expertise in diagnosis, surgical techniques, understanding of psychosocial issues, and recognizing and accepting the significance of individual values of children, families, and support groups. The range of what is considered “appropriate” care and treatment is still very broad and critics point at major gaps between ethical guidelines and current clinical practice. Based on a qualitative study with 27 members of multidisciplinary teams and support groups, we supplement the professional consensus statements and current ethical guidelines with 14 requirements from four different perspectives, to characterize more fully the responsible treatment and support of children and families affected by DSD. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of close collaborations between different experts and a shift from the often simplified dispute about genital surgeries to a more holistic perspective with a long-term management strategy, which should serve as a cornerstone not only for clinical practice but also for future research and evaluation studies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/185787
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jürg C. Streuli
Birgit Köhler
Knut Werner-Rosen
Christine Mitchell
spellingShingle Jürg C. Streuli
Birgit Köhler
Knut Werner-Rosen
Christine Mitchell
DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
Advances in Urology
author_facet Jürg C. Streuli
Birgit Köhler
Knut Werner-Rosen
Christine Mitchell
author_sort Jürg C. Streuli
title DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
title_short DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
title_full DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
title_fullStr DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
title_full_unstemmed DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
title_sort dsd and professionalism from a multilateral view: supplementing the consensus statement on the basis of a qualitative survey
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Urology
issn 1687-6369
1687-6377
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Treatment and support of a child with DSD calls for experience and expertise in diagnosis, surgical techniques, understanding of psychosocial issues, and recognizing and accepting the significance of individual values of children, families, and support groups. The range of what is considered “appropriate” care and treatment is still very broad and critics point at major gaps between ethical guidelines and current clinical practice. Based on a qualitative study with 27 members of multidisciplinary teams and support groups, we supplement the professional consensus statements and current ethical guidelines with 14 requirements from four different perspectives, to characterize more fully the responsible treatment and support of children and families affected by DSD. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of close collaborations between different experts and a shift from the often simplified dispute about genital surgeries to a more holistic perspective with a long-term management strategy, which should serve as a cornerstone not only for clinical practice but also for future research and evaluation studies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/185787
work_keys_str_mv AT jurgcstreuli dsdandprofessionalismfromamultilateralviewsupplementingtheconsensusstatementonthebasisofaqualitativesurvey
AT birgitkohler dsdandprofessionalismfromamultilateralviewsupplementingtheconsensusstatementonthebasisofaqualitativesurvey
AT knutwernerrosen dsdandprofessionalismfromamultilateralviewsupplementingtheconsensusstatementonthebasisofaqualitativesurvey
AT christinemitchell dsdandprofessionalismfromamultilateralviewsupplementingtheconsensusstatementonthebasisofaqualitativesurvey
_version_ 1716810447435333632