The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
Abstract Background Studies of consequences of sickness absence such as health and well-being have been rare whereas risk factors for sickness absence have been studied extensively. This study assumed the consequences of sickness absence would differ by diagnostic group or by patient care type. The...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10942-2 |
id |
doaj-0fd245488ead4cc58953318b2eadceb4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0fd245488ead4cc58953318b2eadceb42021-05-23T11:04:00ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-05-0121111010.1186/s12889-021-10942-2The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sampleAnnina Ropponen0Mo Wang1Jurgita Narusyte2Sanna Kärkkäinen3Victoria Blom4Pia Svedberg5Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetAbstract Background Studies of consequences of sickness absence such as health and well-being have been rare whereas risk factors for sickness absence have been studied extensively. This study assumed the consequences of sickness absence would differ by diagnostic group or by patient care type. The aim was to investigate sickness absence due to various diagnosis groups as a predictor for subsequent inpatient- and specialized outpatient care while controlling for familial confounding. Methods We utilized the register data of 69,552 twin individuals between 16 and 80 years of age (48% women). The first incident sickness absence spell, from baseline year 2005, including diagnosis of sickness absence was our primary exposure of interest and we followed them until the first incident inpatient- and specialized outpatient care episode with main diagnosis code or until 31.12.2013. Results A total of 7464 incident sickness absence spells took place (11%), 42% had inpatient care and 83% specialized outpatient care (mean follow-up time 3.2 years, SD 3.1 years). All the main sickness absence diagnosis groups were associated with increased risk of future care in comparison to no sickness absence. Controlling for confounders attenuated the associations in magnitude but with retaining direction, and we could not confirm an effect of familial factors. Conclusions Sickness absence predicts both inpatient- and specialized outpatient care and the association is universal across diagnosis groups. The lower survival time and incidence rates of inpatient than specialized outpatient care point towards severity of diseases assumption. This finding was also universal across sickness absence diagnosis groups.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10942-2LongitudinalHealth careSick leaveDiagnosisICD-10Population-based |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Annina Ropponen Mo Wang Jurgita Narusyte Sanna Kärkkäinen Victoria Blom Pia Svedberg |
spellingShingle |
Annina Ropponen Mo Wang Jurgita Narusyte Sanna Kärkkäinen Victoria Blom Pia Svedberg The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample BMC Public Health Longitudinal Health care Sick leave Diagnosis ICD-10 Population-based |
author_facet |
Annina Ropponen Mo Wang Jurgita Narusyte Sanna Kärkkäinen Victoria Blom Pia Svedberg |
author_sort |
Annina Ropponen |
title |
The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample |
title_short |
The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample |
title_full |
The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample |
title_fullStr |
The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample |
title_sort |
role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a swedish population-based twin sample |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Studies of consequences of sickness absence such as health and well-being have been rare whereas risk factors for sickness absence have been studied extensively. This study assumed the consequences of sickness absence would differ by diagnostic group or by patient care type. The aim was to investigate sickness absence due to various diagnosis groups as a predictor for subsequent inpatient- and specialized outpatient care while controlling for familial confounding. Methods We utilized the register data of 69,552 twin individuals between 16 and 80 years of age (48% women). The first incident sickness absence spell, from baseline year 2005, including diagnosis of sickness absence was our primary exposure of interest and we followed them until the first incident inpatient- and specialized outpatient care episode with main diagnosis code or until 31.12.2013. Results A total of 7464 incident sickness absence spells took place (11%), 42% had inpatient care and 83% specialized outpatient care (mean follow-up time 3.2 years, SD 3.1 years). All the main sickness absence diagnosis groups were associated with increased risk of future care in comparison to no sickness absence. Controlling for confounders attenuated the associations in magnitude but with retaining direction, and we could not confirm an effect of familial factors. Conclusions Sickness absence predicts both inpatient- and specialized outpatient care and the association is universal across diagnosis groups. The lower survival time and incidence rates of inpatient than specialized outpatient care point towards severity of diseases assumption. This finding was also universal across sickness absence diagnosis groups. |
topic |
Longitudinal Health care Sick leave Diagnosis ICD-10 Population-based |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10942-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anninaropponen theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT mowang theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT jurgitanarusyte theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT sannakarkkainen theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT victoriablom theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT piasvedberg theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT anninaropponen roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT mowang roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT jurgitanarusyte roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT sannakarkkainen roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT victoriablom roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample AT piasvedberg roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample |
_version_ |
1721430260656898048 |