The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample

Abstract Background Studies of consequences of sickness absence such as health and well-being have been rare whereas risk factors for sickness absence have been studied extensively. This study assumed the consequences of sickness absence would differ by diagnostic group or by patient care type. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annina Ropponen, Mo Wang, Jurgita Narusyte, Sanna Kärkkäinen, Victoria Blom, Pia Svedberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10942-2
id doaj-0fd245488ead4cc58953318b2eadceb4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fd245488ead4cc58953318b2eadceb42021-05-23T11:04:00ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-05-0121111010.1186/s12889-021-10942-2The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sampleAnnina Ropponen0Mo Wang1Jurgita Narusyte2Sanna Kärkkäinen3Victoria Blom4Pia Svedberg5Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetAbstract Background Studies of consequences of sickness absence such as health and well-being have been rare whereas risk factors for sickness absence have been studied extensively. This study assumed the consequences of sickness absence would differ by diagnostic group or by patient care type. The aim was to investigate sickness absence due to various diagnosis groups as a predictor for subsequent inpatient- and specialized outpatient care while controlling for familial confounding. Methods We utilized the register data of 69,552 twin individuals between 16 and 80 years of age (48% women). The first incident sickness absence spell, from baseline year 2005, including diagnosis of sickness absence was our primary exposure of interest and we followed them until the first incident inpatient- and specialized outpatient care episode with main diagnosis code or until 31.12.2013. Results A total of 7464 incident sickness absence spells took place (11%), 42% had inpatient care and 83% specialized outpatient care (mean follow-up time 3.2 years, SD 3.1 years). All the main sickness absence diagnosis groups were associated with increased risk of future care in comparison to no sickness absence. Controlling for confounders attenuated the associations in magnitude but with retaining direction, and we could not confirm an effect of familial factors. Conclusions Sickness absence predicts both inpatient- and specialized outpatient care and the association is universal across diagnosis groups. The lower survival time and incidence rates of inpatient than specialized outpatient care point towards severity of diseases assumption. This finding was also universal across sickness absence diagnosis groups.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10942-2LongitudinalHealth careSick leaveDiagnosisICD-10Population-based
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annina Ropponen
Mo Wang
Jurgita Narusyte
Sanna Kärkkäinen
Victoria Blom
Pia Svedberg
spellingShingle Annina Ropponen
Mo Wang
Jurgita Narusyte
Sanna Kärkkäinen
Victoria Blom
Pia Svedberg
The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
BMC Public Health
Longitudinal
Health care
Sick leave
Diagnosis
ICD-10
Population-based
author_facet Annina Ropponen
Mo Wang
Jurgita Narusyte
Sanna Kärkkäinen
Victoria Blom
Pia Svedberg
author_sort Annina Ropponen
title The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
title_short The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
title_full The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
title_fullStr The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
title_full_unstemmed The role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a Swedish population-based twin sample
title_sort role of sickness absence diagnosis for the risk of future inpatient- or specialized outpatient care in a swedish population-based twin sample
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Studies of consequences of sickness absence such as health and well-being have been rare whereas risk factors for sickness absence have been studied extensively. This study assumed the consequences of sickness absence would differ by diagnostic group or by patient care type. The aim was to investigate sickness absence due to various diagnosis groups as a predictor for subsequent inpatient- and specialized outpatient care while controlling for familial confounding. Methods We utilized the register data of 69,552 twin individuals between 16 and 80 years of age (48% women). The first incident sickness absence spell, from baseline year 2005, including diagnosis of sickness absence was our primary exposure of interest and we followed them until the first incident inpatient- and specialized outpatient care episode with main diagnosis code or until 31.12.2013. Results A total of 7464 incident sickness absence spells took place (11%), 42% had inpatient care and 83% specialized outpatient care (mean follow-up time 3.2 years, SD 3.1 years). All the main sickness absence diagnosis groups were associated with increased risk of future care in comparison to no sickness absence. Controlling for confounders attenuated the associations in magnitude but with retaining direction, and we could not confirm an effect of familial factors. Conclusions Sickness absence predicts both inpatient- and specialized outpatient care and the association is universal across diagnosis groups. The lower survival time and incidence rates of inpatient than specialized outpatient care point towards severity of diseases assumption. This finding was also universal across sickness absence diagnosis groups.
topic Longitudinal
Health care
Sick leave
Diagnosis
ICD-10
Population-based
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10942-2
work_keys_str_mv AT anninaropponen theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT mowang theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT jurgitanarusyte theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT sannakarkkainen theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT victoriablom theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT piasvedberg theroleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT anninaropponen roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT mowang roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT jurgitanarusyte roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT sannakarkkainen roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT victoriablom roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
AT piasvedberg roleofsicknessabsencediagnosisfortheriskoffutureinpatientorspecializedoutpatientcareinaswedishpopulationbasedtwinsample
_version_ 1721430260656898048