Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Methods Parallel group randomized controlled trial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James D. Chalmers, Megan L. Crichton, Gill Brady, Simon Finch, Mike Lonergan, Thomas C. Fardon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0
id doaj-0fd14e12b83d4f2293d60ffd01524088
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fd14e12b83d4f2293d60ffd015240882020-11-25T02:13:43ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662019-05-011911910.1186/s12890-019-0856-0Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trialJames D. Chalmers0Megan L. Crichton1Gill Brady2Simon Finch3Mike Lonergan4Thomas C. Fardon5Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolAbstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Methods Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation. Results Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31–2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant. Conclusions This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Trial registration NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.gov 29th June 2014.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James D. Chalmers
Megan L. Crichton
Gill Brady
Simon Finch
Mike Lonergan
Thomas C. Fardon
spellingShingle James D. Chalmers
Megan L. Crichton
Gill Brady
Simon Finch
Mike Lonergan
Thomas C. Fardon
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
author_facet James D. Chalmers
Megan L. Crichton
Gill Brady
Simon Finch
Mike Lonergan
Thomas C. Fardon
author_sort James D. Chalmers
title Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_short Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
issn 1471-2466
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Methods Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation. Results Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31–2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant. Conclusions This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Trial registration NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.gov 29th June 2014.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesdchalmers pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meganlcrichton pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gillbrady pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simonfinch pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mikelonergan pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomascfardon pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724903477363081216