Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Methods Parallel group randomized controlled trial...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Pulmonary Medicine |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0 |
id |
doaj-0fd14e12b83d4f2293d60ffd01524088 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0fd14e12b83d4f2293d60ffd015240882020-11-25T02:13:43ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662019-05-011911910.1186/s12890-019-0856-0Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trialJames D. Chalmers0Megan L. Crichton1Gill Brady2Simon Finch3Mike Lonergan4Thomas C. Fardon5Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolAbstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Methods Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation. Results Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31–2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant. Conclusions This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Trial registration NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.gov 29th June 2014.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
James D. Chalmers Megan L. Crichton Gill Brady Simon Finch Mike Lonergan Thomas C. Fardon |
spellingShingle |
James D. Chalmers Megan L. Crichton Gill Brady Simon Finch Mike Lonergan Thomas C. Fardon Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial BMC Pulmonary Medicine |
author_facet |
James D. Chalmers Megan L. Crichton Gill Brady Simon Finch Mike Lonergan Thomas C. Fardon |
author_sort |
James D. Chalmers |
title |
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine |
issn |
1471-2466 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Methods Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation. Results Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31–2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant. Conclusions This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Trial registration NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.gov 29th June 2014. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0856-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jamesdchalmers pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meganlcrichton pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gillbrady pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT simonfinch pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mikelonergan pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thomascfardon pulmonaryrehabilitationafterexacerbationofbronchiectasisapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1724903477363081216 |