Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review

Background Medicalization has been a topic of discussion and research for over four decades. It is a known concept to researchers from a broad range of disciplines. Medicalization appears to be a concept that speaks to all, suggesting a shared understanding of what it constitutes. However, conceptua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wieteke van Dijk, Marjan J. Meinders, Marit A.C. Tanke, Gert P. Westert, Patrick P.T. Jeurissen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-08-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3726_b04b16c6c8db796849fc23529ca0d48f.pdf
id doaj-0fb451149e164ea18b61cce9ba595513
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fb451149e164ea18b61cce9ba5955132020-11-25T03:34:51ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392020-08-019832733410.15171/ijhpm.2019.1013726Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping ReviewWieteke van Dijk0Marjan J. Meinders1Marit A.C. Tanke2Gert P. Westert3Patrick P.T. Jeurissen4Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsBackground Medicalization has been a topic of discussion and research for over four decades. It is a known concept to researchers from a broad range of disciplines. Medicalization appears to be a concept that speaks to all, suggesting a shared understanding of what it constitutes. However, conceptually, the definition of medicalization has evolved over time. It is unknown how the concept is applied in empirical research, therefore following research question was answered: How is medicalization defined in empirical research and how do the definitions differ from each other?   Methods We performed a scoping review on the empirical research on medicalization. The 5 steps of a scoping review were followed: (1) Identifying the research question; (2) Identifying relevant studies; (3) Inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) Charting the data; and (5) Collating, summarizing and reporting the results. The screening of 3027 papers resulted in the inclusion of 50 empirical studies in the review.   Results The application of the concept of medicalization within empirical studies proved quite diverse. The used conceptual definitions could be divided into 10 categories, which differed from each other subtly though importantly. The ten categories could be placed in a framework, containing two axes. The one axe represents a continuum from value neutral definitions to value laden definitions. The other axe represents a continuum from a micro to a macro perspective on medicalization.   Conclusion This review shows that empirical research on medicalization is quite heterogeneous in its definition of the concept. This reveals the richness and complexity of medicalization, once more, but also hinders the comparability of studies. Future empirical research should pay more attention to the choice made with regard to the definition of medialization and its applicability to the context of the studyhttps://www.ijhpm.com/article_3726_b04b16c6c8db796849fc23529ca0d48f.pdfmedicalizationscoping reviewdefinitions in epirical use
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wieteke van Dijk
Marjan J. Meinders
Marit A.C. Tanke
Gert P. Westert
Patrick P.T. Jeurissen
spellingShingle Wieteke van Dijk
Marjan J. Meinders
Marit A.C. Tanke
Gert P. Westert
Patrick P.T. Jeurissen
Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
medicalization
scoping review
definitions in epirical use
author_facet Wieteke van Dijk
Marjan J. Meinders
Marit A.C. Tanke
Gert P. Westert
Patrick P.T. Jeurissen
author_sort Wieteke van Dijk
title Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
title_short Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
title_full Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
title_sort medicalization defined in empirical contexts – a scoping review
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
issn 2322-5939
2322-5939
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background Medicalization has been a topic of discussion and research for over four decades. It is a known concept to researchers from a broad range of disciplines. Medicalization appears to be a concept that speaks to all, suggesting a shared understanding of what it constitutes. However, conceptually, the definition of medicalization has evolved over time. It is unknown how the concept is applied in empirical research, therefore following research question was answered: How is medicalization defined in empirical research and how do the definitions differ from each other?   Methods We performed a scoping review on the empirical research on medicalization. The 5 steps of a scoping review were followed: (1) Identifying the research question; (2) Identifying relevant studies; (3) Inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) Charting the data; and (5) Collating, summarizing and reporting the results. The screening of 3027 papers resulted in the inclusion of 50 empirical studies in the review.   Results The application of the concept of medicalization within empirical studies proved quite diverse. The used conceptual definitions could be divided into 10 categories, which differed from each other subtly though importantly. The ten categories could be placed in a framework, containing two axes. The one axe represents a continuum from value neutral definitions to value laden definitions. The other axe represents a continuum from a micro to a macro perspective on medicalization.   Conclusion This review shows that empirical research on medicalization is quite heterogeneous in its definition of the concept. This reveals the richness and complexity of medicalization, once more, but also hinders the comparability of studies. Future empirical research should pay more attention to the choice made with regard to the definition of medialization and its applicability to the context of the study
topic medicalization
scoping review
definitions in epirical use
url https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3726_b04b16c6c8db796849fc23529ca0d48f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wietekevandijk medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview
AT marjanjmeinders medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview
AT maritactanke medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview
AT gertpwestert medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview
AT patrickptjeurissen medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview
_version_ 1724557102379171840