Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review
Background Medicalization has been a topic of discussion and research for over four decades. It is a known concept to researchers from a broad range of disciplines. Medicalization appears to be a concept that speaks to all, suggesting a shared understanding of what it constitutes. However, conceptua...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2020-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3726_b04b16c6c8db796849fc23529ca0d48f.pdf |
id |
doaj-0fb451149e164ea18b61cce9ba595513 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0fb451149e164ea18b61cce9ba5955132020-11-25T03:34:51ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392020-08-019832733410.15171/ijhpm.2019.1013726Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping ReviewWieteke van Dijk0Marjan J. Meinders1Marit A.C. Tanke2Gert P. Westert3Patrick P.T. Jeurissen4Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsBackground Medicalization has been a topic of discussion and research for over four decades. It is a known concept to researchers from a broad range of disciplines. Medicalization appears to be a concept that speaks to all, suggesting a shared understanding of what it constitutes. However, conceptually, the definition of medicalization has evolved over time. It is unknown how the concept is applied in empirical research, therefore following research question was answered: How is medicalization defined in empirical research and how do the definitions differ from each other? Methods We performed a scoping review on the empirical research on medicalization. The 5 steps of a scoping review were followed: (1) Identifying the research question; (2) Identifying relevant studies; (3) Inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) Charting the data; and (5) Collating, summarizing and reporting the results. The screening of 3027 papers resulted in the inclusion of 50 empirical studies in the review. Results The application of the concept of medicalization within empirical studies proved quite diverse. The used conceptual definitions could be divided into 10 categories, which differed from each other subtly though importantly. The ten categories could be placed in a framework, containing two axes. The one axe represents a continuum from value neutral definitions to value laden definitions. The other axe represents a continuum from a micro to a macro perspective on medicalization. Conclusion This review shows that empirical research on medicalization is quite heterogeneous in its definition of the concept. This reveals the richness and complexity of medicalization, once more, but also hinders the comparability of studies. Future empirical research should pay more attention to the choice made with regard to the definition of medialization and its applicability to the context of the studyhttps://www.ijhpm.com/article_3726_b04b16c6c8db796849fc23529ca0d48f.pdfmedicalizationscoping reviewdefinitions in epirical use |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wieteke van Dijk Marjan J. Meinders Marit A.C. Tanke Gert P. Westert Patrick P.T. Jeurissen |
spellingShingle |
Wieteke van Dijk Marjan J. Meinders Marit A.C. Tanke Gert P. Westert Patrick P.T. Jeurissen Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review International Journal of Health Policy and Management medicalization scoping review definitions in epirical use |
author_facet |
Wieteke van Dijk Marjan J. Meinders Marit A.C. Tanke Gert P. Westert Patrick P.T. Jeurissen |
author_sort |
Wieteke van Dijk |
title |
Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review |
title_short |
Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review |
title_full |
Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr |
Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts – A Scoping Review |
title_sort |
medicalization defined in empirical contexts – a scoping review |
publisher |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
series |
International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
issn |
2322-5939 2322-5939 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Background Medicalization has been a topic of discussion and research for over four decades. It is a known concept to researchers from a broad range of disciplines. Medicalization appears to be a concept that speaks to all, suggesting a shared understanding of what it constitutes. However, conceptually, the definition of medicalization has evolved over time. It is unknown how the concept is applied in empirical research, therefore following research question was answered: How is medicalization defined in empirical research and how do the definitions differ from each other? Methods We performed a scoping review on the empirical research on medicalization. The 5 steps of a scoping review were followed: (1) Identifying the research question; (2) Identifying relevant studies; (3) Inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) Charting the data; and (5) Collating, summarizing and reporting the results. The screening of 3027 papers resulted in the inclusion of 50 empirical studies in the review. Results The application of the concept of medicalization within empirical studies proved quite diverse. The used conceptual definitions could be divided into 10 categories, which differed from each other subtly though importantly. The ten categories could be placed in a framework, containing two axes. The one axe represents a continuum from value neutral definitions to value laden definitions. The other axe represents a continuum from a micro to a macro perspective on medicalization. Conclusion This review shows that empirical research on medicalization is quite heterogeneous in its definition of the concept. This reveals the richness and complexity of medicalization, once more, but also hinders the comparability of studies. Future empirical research should pay more attention to the choice made with regard to the definition of medialization and its applicability to the context of the study |
topic |
medicalization scoping review definitions in epirical use |
url |
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3726_b04b16c6c8db796849fc23529ca0d48f.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wietekevandijk medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview AT marjanjmeinders medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview AT maritactanke medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview AT gertpwestert medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview AT patrickptjeurissen medicalizationdefinedinempiricalcontextsascopingreview |
_version_ |
1724557102379171840 |