Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes

• Main Authors: Susan Lessick, Carol Perryman, Brooke L. Billman, Kristine M. Alpi, Sandra L. De Groote, Ted D. Babin Jr.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2016-11-01
• Series: Journal of the Medical Library Association
• Subjects: Libraries, Medical; Library Surveys; Research Report; Library Science Research
• Online Access: http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/68

Introduction: The extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation. Methods: An online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized openended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments. Results: Analysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described. Conclusions: Findings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.