A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression

Abstract Background This study is a secondary analysis of the trial by Callaghan et al. (2011), which reported higher antidepressant effects for preferred intensity (n = 19) vs. prescribed intensity (n = 19) exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks in depressed women. In particular, the prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ioannis D. Morres, Anton Hinton-Bayre, Efthymios Motakis, Tim Carter, Patrick Callaghan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-7238-7
id doaj-0fb1180ef971460cb5331779945604d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fb1180ef971460cb5331779945604d72020-11-25T03:33:00ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-07-0119111110.1186/s12889-019-7238-7A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depressionIoannis D. Morres0Anton Hinton-Bayre1Efthymios Motakis2Tim Carter3Patrick Callaghan4Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Exercise Psychology and Quality of Life Laboratory, University of ThessalySchool of Surgery, Ear Science Centre, University of Western AustraliaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University of SingaporeSchool of Health Sciences, University of NottinghamSchool of Applied Sciences, London South Bank UniversityAbstract Background This study is a secondary analysis of the trial by Callaghan et al. (2011), which reported higher antidepressant effects for preferred intensity (n = 19) vs. prescribed intensity (n = 19) exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks in depressed women. In particular, the present study sought to examine whether greater clinically significant individual change/recovery was observed in the preferred compared to the prescribed exercise group. Methods The reliable change index and the Ccutoff score criteria described by Jacobson and Truax (1991) were employed to determine clinical significance. These criteria examined if individual change in depression scores from pre- to post-intervention in the preferred intensity group were statistically significant beyond the standard error of difference derived from the active comparator prescribed group, and subsequently within a normal population range. Patients fulfilling the first or both criteria were classified as improved or recovered, respectively. Results Post-intervention depression scores of six patients in the preferred intensity exercise group (32%) demonstrated statistically reliable improvement (p < 0.05) and recovery. Half of this subgroup started as moderately depressed. No patient demonstrated a reliable deterioration in depression. Due to a small sample size, it was impossible to determine whether patients on psychiatric medication or medication-free patients were equally benefited from preferred intensity exercise. Thirteen patients in the preferred intensity group (68%) displayed non-statistically significant change in post-intervention depression scores (p > 0.05), although eight of them showed a non-significant improvement in post-intervention depression scores and three could not technically show an improvement in depression due to floor effects (baseline depression within normal range). Conclusions Preferred intensity exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks led almost a third of the patients to record scores consistent with recovery from depression. Health professionals may consider that short-term preferred intensity exercise provides clinically significant antidepressant effects comparing favourably to exercise on prescription.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-7238-7ExercisePreferred intensityDepressionIndividual clinical significance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ioannis D. Morres
Anton Hinton-Bayre
Efthymios Motakis
Tim Carter
Patrick Callaghan
spellingShingle Ioannis D. Morres
Anton Hinton-Bayre
Efthymios Motakis
Tim Carter
Patrick Callaghan
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
BMC Public Health
Exercise
Preferred intensity
Depression
Individual clinical significance
author_facet Ioannis D. Morres
Anton Hinton-Bayre
Efthymios Motakis
Tim Carter
Patrick Callaghan
author_sort Ioannis D. Morres
title A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
title_short A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
title_full A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
title_fullStr A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
title_full_unstemmed A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
title_sort pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the united kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Background This study is a secondary analysis of the trial by Callaghan et al. (2011), which reported higher antidepressant effects for preferred intensity (n = 19) vs. prescribed intensity (n = 19) exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks in depressed women. In particular, the present study sought to examine whether greater clinically significant individual change/recovery was observed in the preferred compared to the prescribed exercise group. Methods The reliable change index and the Ccutoff score criteria described by Jacobson and Truax (1991) were employed to determine clinical significance. These criteria examined if individual change in depression scores from pre- to post-intervention in the preferred intensity group were statistically significant beyond the standard error of difference derived from the active comparator prescribed group, and subsequently within a normal population range. Patients fulfilling the first or both criteria were classified as improved or recovered, respectively. Results Post-intervention depression scores of six patients in the preferred intensity exercise group (32%) demonstrated statistically reliable improvement (p < 0.05) and recovery. Half of this subgroup started as moderately depressed. No patient demonstrated a reliable deterioration in depression. Due to a small sample size, it was impossible to determine whether patients on psychiatric medication or medication-free patients were equally benefited from preferred intensity exercise. Thirteen patients in the preferred intensity group (68%) displayed non-statistically significant change in post-intervention depression scores (p > 0.05), although eight of them showed a non-significant improvement in post-intervention depression scores and three could not technically show an improvement in depression due to floor effects (baseline depression within normal range). Conclusions Preferred intensity exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks led almost a third of the patients to record scores consistent with recovery from depression. Health professionals may consider that short-term preferred intensity exercise provides clinically significant antidepressant effects comparing favourably to exercise on prescription.
topic Exercise
Preferred intensity
Depression
Individual clinical significance
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-7238-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ioannisdmorres apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT antonhintonbayre apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT efthymiosmotakis apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT timcarter apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT patrickcallaghan apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT ioannisdmorres pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT antonhintonbayre pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT efthymiosmotakis pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT timcarter pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
AT patrickcallaghan pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofpreferredintensityexerciseindepressedadultwomenintheunitedkingdomsecondaryanalysisofindividualvariabilityofdepression
_version_ 1724565370500546560