Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research

This paper presents the results of a meta-analysis conducted on 40 case studies of transdisciplinary research. First, it groups the cases according to the sustainability conception that is adopted in the project, distinguishing between approaches to sustainability that consider environmental protect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agathe Osinski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1266
id doaj-0fb06e472e5d44759665015989a68a3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fb06e472e5d44759665015989a68a3a2021-01-27T00:01:37ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-01-01131266126610.3390/su13031266Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary ResearchAgathe Osinski0Philosophy of Law Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumThis paper presents the results of a meta-analysis conducted on 40 case studies of transdisciplinary research. First, it groups the cases according to the sustainability conception that is adopted in the project, distinguishing between approaches to sustainability that consider environmental protection alone, approaches that seek to find a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, and those which seek to integrate the social, environmental and economic aspects of sustainability. Next, the paper explores the extent to which the conception of sustainability adopted in the transdisciplinary project influences a series of process features in the projects. In particular, we focus on the extent to which the projects allowed for the participation of disadvantaged groups, the degree to which they accounted for and attempted to mitigate power differentials between participants, their embeddedness in longer-term dynamics and the heterogeneity of the actors piloting the projects. We also discuss the effects of these on the social learning and empowerment generated among participants. The paper finds that among the selected case studies, those with an integrated approach to sustainability more often included disadvantaged groups and acknowledged power differentials, applying a range of tools to mitigate these. Moreover, these cases also more often reported generating empowerment and social learning.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1266transdisciplinaritysustainabilitysustainability sciencesocial learningempowermentpower
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agathe Osinski
spellingShingle Agathe Osinski
Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research
Sustainability
transdisciplinarity
sustainability
sustainability science
social learning
empowerment
power
author_facet Agathe Osinski
author_sort Agathe Osinski
title Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research
title_short Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research
title_full Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research
title_fullStr Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Critical Sustainability Science? Participation of Disadvantaged Actors and Power Relations in Transdisciplinary Research
title_sort towards a critical sustainability science? participation of disadvantaged actors and power relations in transdisciplinary research
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-01-01
description This paper presents the results of a meta-analysis conducted on 40 case studies of transdisciplinary research. First, it groups the cases according to the sustainability conception that is adopted in the project, distinguishing between approaches to sustainability that consider environmental protection alone, approaches that seek to find a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, and those which seek to integrate the social, environmental and economic aspects of sustainability. Next, the paper explores the extent to which the conception of sustainability adopted in the transdisciplinary project influences a series of process features in the projects. In particular, we focus on the extent to which the projects allowed for the participation of disadvantaged groups, the degree to which they accounted for and attempted to mitigate power differentials between participants, their embeddedness in longer-term dynamics and the heterogeneity of the actors piloting the projects. We also discuss the effects of these on the social learning and empowerment generated among participants. The paper finds that among the selected case studies, those with an integrated approach to sustainability more often included disadvantaged groups and acknowledged power differentials, applying a range of tools to mitigate these. Moreover, these cases also more often reported generating empowerment and social learning.
topic transdisciplinarity
sustainability
sustainability science
social learning
empowerment
power
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1266
work_keys_str_mv AT agatheosinski towardsacriticalsustainabilityscienceparticipationofdisadvantagedactorsandpowerrelationsintransdisciplinaryresearch
_version_ 1724322130871451648