Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature

As more researchers have considered the use of mixed methods, writings have moved away from debates about epistemological incompatibilities and now focus on the (potential) value of increased understanding that comes from combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Yet, as the level of integr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chad Walker, Jamie Baxter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919834379
id doaj-0fafcad0a03f4dfa837975c1eb523336
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fafcad0a03f4dfa837975c1eb5233362020-11-25T03:40:13ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692019-04-011810.1177/1609406919834379Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy LiteratureChad Walker0Jamie Baxter1 Department of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Department of Geography, Western University, London, Ontario, CanadaAs more researchers have considered the use of mixed methods, writings have moved away from debates about epistemological incompatibilities and now focus on the (potential) value of increased understanding that comes from combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Yet, as the level of integration can vary substantially, some designs are said to allow one method or the other to dominate. Although there may be sound reasoning for intentionally allowing one method to dominate, here we investigate one literature as a moment to reflect why, and on the degree to which mixed methods sequence is so bound up with methodological dominance, that calling such studies “mixed” may seem misleading. Like the history of social science more generally, it is quantitative research that is typically given more weight in these studies and academics have noted a few reasons why this may be the case. Few have investigated how research design—and more specifically method sequence—may impact method dominance. Using an emerging mixed methods literature surrounding the social acceptance of wind energy ( N = 34), we study the relationship between the timing of each method (i.e., sequence) and method dominance to see whether qualitative methods in particular are marginalized. Through our Dominance in Mixed Methods Assessment model, we provide evidence that indeed qualitative methods are marginalized and this may be associated with method sequence and other design elements. Moreover, some authors focus solely on one method, giving pause to caution both writers and readers about the use of the term “mixed methods.” The analytical approach is detailed enough to be replicated and detect whether these patterns are repeated in other research domains.https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919834379
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chad Walker
Jamie Baxter
spellingShingle Chad Walker
Jamie Baxter
Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
author_facet Chad Walker
Jamie Baxter
author_sort Chad Walker
title Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature
title_short Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature
title_full Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature
title_fullStr Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature
title_full_unstemmed Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature
title_sort method sequence and dominance in mixed methods research: a case study of the social acceptance of wind energy literature
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
issn 1609-4069
publishDate 2019-04-01
description As more researchers have considered the use of mixed methods, writings have moved away from debates about epistemological incompatibilities and now focus on the (potential) value of increased understanding that comes from combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Yet, as the level of integration can vary substantially, some designs are said to allow one method or the other to dominate. Although there may be sound reasoning for intentionally allowing one method to dominate, here we investigate one literature as a moment to reflect why, and on the degree to which mixed methods sequence is so bound up with methodological dominance, that calling such studies “mixed” may seem misleading. Like the history of social science more generally, it is quantitative research that is typically given more weight in these studies and academics have noted a few reasons why this may be the case. Few have investigated how research design—and more specifically method sequence—may impact method dominance. Using an emerging mixed methods literature surrounding the social acceptance of wind energy ( N = 34), we study the relationship between the timing of each method (i.e., sequence) and method dominance to see whether qualitative methods in particular are marginalized. Through our Dominance in Mixed Methods Assessment model, we provide evidence that indeed qualitative methods are marginalized and this may be associated with method sequence and other design elements. Moreover, some authors focus solely on one method, giving pause to caution both writers and readers about the use of the term “mixed methods.” The analytical approach is detailed enough to be replicated and detect whether these patterns are repeated in other research domains.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919834379
work_keys_str_mv AT chadwalker methodsequenceanddominanceinmixedmethodsresearchacasestudyofthesocialacceptanceofwindenergyliterature
AT jamiebaxter methodsequenceanddominanceinmixedmethodsresearchacasestudyofthesocialacceptanceofwindenergyliterature
_version_ 1724535446170501120