Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems

An analysis of three major aspects has been carried out that may apply to any of the successive voting systems used for the European Union Council of Ministers, from the first one established in the Treaty of Rome in 1958 to the current one established in Lisbon. We mainly consider the voting system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesc Carreras, Josep Freixas, Antonio Magaña
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wrocław University of Science and Technology 2016-01-01
Series:Operations Research and Decisions
Online Access:http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1220
id doaj-0faa7dfedcd24eceb16d4b8a8932f433
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0faa7dfedcd24eceb16d4b8a8932f4332020-11-24T21:21:31ZengWrocław University of Science and TechnologyOperations Research and Decisions2081-88582391-60602016-01-01vol. 26no. 23152171441918Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting SystemsFrancesc Carreras0Josep Freixas1Antonio Magaña2Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, SpainUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, SpainUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, SpainAn analysis of three major aspects has been carried out that may apply to any of the successive voting systems used for the European Union Council of Ministers, from the first one established in the Treaty of Rome in 1958 to the current one established in Lisbon. We mainly consider the voting systems designed for the enlarged European Union adopted in the Athens summit, held in April 2003 but this analysis can be applied to any other system. First, it is shown that the dimension of these voting systems does not, in general, reduce. Next, the egalitarian effects of superposing two or three weighted majority games (often by introducing additional consensus) are considered. Finally, the decisiveness of these voting systems is evaluated and compared. (original abstract)http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1220
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesc Carreras
Josep Freixas
Antonio Magaña
spellingShingle Francesc Carreras
Josep Freixas
Antonio Magaña
Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems
Operations Research and Decisions
author_facet Francesc Carreras
Josep Freixas
Antonio Magaña
author_sort Francesc Carreras
title Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems
title_short Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems
title_full Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems
title_fullStr Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems
title_full_unstemmed Dimension, Egalitarianism and Decisiveness of European Voting Systems
title_sort dimension, egalitarianism and decisiveness of european voting systems
publisher Wrocław University of Science and Technology
series Operations Research and Decisions
issn 2081-8858
2391-6060
publishDate 2016-01-01
description An analysis of three major aspects has been carried out that may apply to any of the successive voting systems used for the European Union Council of Ministers, from the first one established in the Treaty of Rome in 1958 to the current one established in Lisbon. We mainly consider the voting systems designed for the enlarged European Union adopted in the Athens summit, held in April 2003 but this analysis can be applied to any other system. First, it is shown that the dimension of these voting systems does not, in general, reduce. Next, the egalitarian effects of superposing two or three weighted majority games (often by introducing additional consensus) are considered. Finally, the decisiveness of these voting systems is evaluated and compared. (original abstract)
url http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1220
work_keys_str_mv AT francesccarreras dimensionegalitarianismanddecisivenessofeuropeanvotingsystems
AT josepfreixas dimensionegalitarianismanddecisivenessofeuropeanvotingsystems
AT antoniomagana dimensionegalitarianismanddecisivenessofeuropeanvotingsystems
_version_ 1725999496814395392