Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?

Research using animals is controversial. To develop sound public outreach and policy about this issue, we need information about both the underlying science and people's attitudes and knowledge. To identify attitudes toward this subject at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, we developed and a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric P Sandgren, Robert Streiffer, Jennifer Dykema, Nadia Assad, Jackson Moberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223375
id doaj-0f88049776af48c6b138d34a42fa8264
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f88049776af48c6b138d34a42fa82642021-03-03T21:11:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022337510.1371/journal.pone.0223375Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?Eric P SandgrenRobert StreifferJennifer DykemaNadia AssadJackson MobergResearch using animals is controversial. To develop sound public outreach and policy about this issue, we need information about both the underlying science and people's attitudes and knowledge. To identify attitudes toward this subject at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, we developed and administered a survey to undergraduate students and faculty. The survey asked respondents about the importance of, their confidence in their knowledge about, and who they trusted to provide information on animal research. Findings indicated attitudes varied by academic discipline, especially among faculty. Faculty in the biological sciences, particularly those who had participated in an animal research project, reported the issue to be most important, and they reported greater confidence in their knowledge about pro and con arguments. Among students, being female, a vegetarian/vegan, or participating in animal research were associated with higher ratings of importance. Confidence in knowledge about regulation and its adequacy was very low across all groups except biological science faculty. Both students and faculty identified university courses and spokespersons to be the most trusted sources of information about animal research. UW-Madison has a long history of openness about animal research, which correlates with the high level of trust by students and faculty. Nevertheless, confidence in knowledge about animal research and its regulation remains limited, and both students and faculty indicated their desire to receive more information from courses and spokespersons. Based on these findings, we argue that providing robust university-wide outreach and course-based content about animal research should be considered an organizational best practice, in particular for colleges and universities.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223375
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric P Sandgren
Robert Streiffer
Jennifer Dykema
Nadia Assad
Jackson Moberg
spellingShingle Eric P Sandgren
Robert Streiffer
Jennifer Dykema
Nadia Assad
Jackson Moberg
Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Eric P Sandgren
Robert Streiffer
Jennifer Dykema
Nadia Assad
Jackson Moberg
author_sort Eric P Sandgren
title Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
title_short Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
title_full Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
title_fullStr Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
title_full_unstemmed Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
title_sort assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: what do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Research using animals is controversial. To develop sound public outreach and policy about this issue, we need information about both the underlying science and people's attitudes and knowledge. To identify attitudes toward this subject at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, we developed and administered a survey to undergraduate students and faculty. The survey asked respondents about the importance of, their confidence in their knowledge about, and who they trusted to provide information on animal research. Findings indicated attitudes varied by academic discipline, especially among faculty. Faculty in the biological sciences, particularly those who had participated in an animal research project, reported the issue to be most important, and they reported greater confidence in their knowledge about pro and con arguments. Among students, being female, a vegetarian/vegan, or participating in animal research were associated with higher ratings of importance. Confidence in knowledge about regulation and its adequacy was very low across all groups except biological science faculty. Both students and faculty identified university courses and spokespersons to be the most trusted sources of information about animal research. UW-Madison has a long history of openness about animal research, which correlates with the high level of trust by students and faculty. Nevertheless, confidence in knowledge about animal research and its regulation remains limited, and both students and faculty indicated their desire to receive more information from courses and spokespersons. Based on these findings, we argue that providing robust university-wide outreach and course-based content about animal research should be considered an organizational best practice, in particular for colleges and universities.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223375
work_keys_str_mv AT ericpsandgren assessingundergraduatestudentandfacultyviewsonanimalresearchwhatdotheyknowwhomdotheytrustandhowmuchdotheycare
AT robertstreiffer assessingundergraduatestudentandfacultyviewsonanimalresearchwhatdotheyknowwhomdotheytrustandhowmuchdotheycare
AT jenniferdykema assessingundergraduatestudentandfacultyviewsonanimalresearchwhatdotheyknowwhomdotheytrustandhowmuchdotheycare
AT nadiaassad assessingundergraduatestudentandfacultyviewsonanimalresearchwhatdotheyknowwhomdotheytrustandhowmuchdotheycare
AT jacksonmoberg assessingundergraduatestudentandfacultyviewsonanimalresearchwhatdotheyknowwhomdotheytrustandhowmuchdotheycare
_version_ 1714818266620231680