Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis
BackgroundThe exposure and consumption of information during epidemic outbreaks may alter people’s risk perception and trigger behavioral changes, which can ultimately affect the evolution of the disease. It is thus of utmost importance to map the dissemination of information...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | http://www.jmir.org/2020/10/e21597/ |
id |
doaj-0f70432673d74aebb2306161f4f3421a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0f70432673d74aebb2306161f4f3421a2021-04-02T18:40:31ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712020-10-012210e2159710.2196/21597Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods AnalysisGozzi, NicolòTizzani, MicheleStarnini, MicheleCiulla, FabioPaolotti, DanielaPanisson, AndréPerra, Nicola BackgroundThe exposure and consumption of information during epidemic outbreaks may alter people’s risk perception and trigger behavioral changes, which can ultimately affect the evolution of the disease. It is thus of utmost importance to map the dissemination of information by mainstream media outlets and the public response to this information. However, our understanding of this exposure-response dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic is still limited. ObjectiveThe goal of this study is to characterize the media coverage and collective internet response to the COVID-19 pandemic in four countries: Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada. MethodsWe collected a heterogeneous data set including 227,768 web-based news articles and 13,448 YouTube videos published by mainstream media outlets, 107,898 user posts and 3,829,309 comments on the social media platform Reddit, and 278,456,892 views of COVID-19–related Wikipedia pages. To analyze the relationship between media coverage, epidemic progression, and users’ collective web-based response, we considered a linear regression model that predicts the public response for each country given the amount of news exposure. We also applied topic modelling to the data set using nonnegative matrix factorization. ResultsOur results show that public attention, quantified as user activity on Reddit and active searches on Wikipedia pages, is mainly driven by media coverage; meanwhile, this activity declines rapidly while news exposure and COVID-19 incidence remain high. Furthermore, using an unsupervised, dynamic topic modeling approach, we show that while the levels of attention dedicated to different topics by media outlets and internet users are in good accordance, interesting deviations emerge in their temporal patterns. ConclusionsOverall, our findings offer an additional key to interpret public perception and response to the current global health emergency and raise questions about the effects of attention saturation on people’s collective awareness and risk perception and thus on their tendencies toward behavioral change.http://www.jmir.org/2020/10/e21597/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gozzi, Nicolò Tizzani, Michele Starnini, Michele Ciulla, Fabio Paolotti, Daniela Panisson, André Perra, Nicola |
spellingShingle |
Gozzi, Nicolò Tizzani, Michele Starnini, Michele Ciulla, Fabio Paolotti, Daniela Panisson, André Perra, Nicola Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis Journal of Medical Internet Research |
author_facet |
Gozzi, Nicolò Tizzani, Michele Starnini, Michele Ciulla, Fabio Paolotti, Daniela Panisson, André Perra, Nicola |
author_sort |
Gozzi, Nicolò |
title |
Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_short |
Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_full |
Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_sort |
collective response to media coverage of the covid-19 pandemic on reddit and wikipedia: mixed-methods analysis |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Internet Research |
issn |
1438-8871 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
BackgroundThe exposure and consumption of information during epidemic outbreaks may alter people’s risk perception and trigger behavioral changes, which can ultimately affect the evolution of the disease. It is thus of utmost importance to map the dissemination of information by mainstream media outlets and the public response to this information. However, our understanding of this exposure-response dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic is still limited.
ObjectiveThe goal of this study is to characterize the media coverage and collective internet response to the COVID-19 pandemic in four countries: Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada.
MethodsWe collected a heterogeneous data set including 227,768 web-based news articles and 13,448 YouTube videos published by mainstream media outlets, 107,898 user posts and 3,829,309 comments on the social media platform Reddit, and 278,456,892 views of COVID-19–related Wikipedia pages. To analyze the relationship between media coverage, epidemic progression, and users’ collective web-based response, we considered a linear regression model that predicts the public response for each country given the amount of news exposure. We also applied topic modelling to the data set using nonnegative matrix factorization.
ResultsOur results show that public attention, quantified as user activity on Reddit and active searches on Wikipedia pages, is mainly driven by media coverage; meanwhile, this activity declines rapidly while news exposure and COVID-19 incidence remain high. Furthermore, using an unsupervised, dynamic topic modeling approach, we show that while the levels of attention dedicated to different topics by media outlets and internet users are in good accordance, interesting deviations emerge in their temporal patterns.
ConclusionsOverall, our findings offer an additional key to interpret public perception and response to the current global health emergency and raise questions about the effects of attention saturation on people’s collective awareness and risk perception and thus on their tendencies toward behavioral change. |
url |
http://www.jmir.org/2020/10/e21597/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gozzinicolo collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis AT tizzanimichele collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis AT starninimichele collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis AT ciullafabio collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis AT paolottidaniela collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis AT panissonandre collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis AT perranicola collectiveresponsetomediacoverageofthecovid19pandemiconredditandwikipediamixedmethodsanalysis |
_version_ |
1721551232269549568 |