Implementation of a physically based water percolation routine in the Crocus/SURFEX (V7.3) snowpack model
We present a new water percolation routine added to the one-dimensional snowpack model Crocus as an alternative to the empirical bucket routine. This routine solves the Richards equation, which describes flow of water through unsaturated porous snow governed by capillary suction, gravity and hydr...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
Online Access: | https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/3547/2017/gmd-10-3547-2017.pdf |
Summary: | We present a new water percolation routine added to the one-dimensional snowpack model
Crocus as an alternative to the empirical bucket routine. This routine solves
the Richards equation, which describes flow of water through unsaturated
porous snow governed by capillary suction, gravity and hydraulic conductivity
of the snow layers. We tested the Richards routine on two data sets, one
recorded from an automatic weather station over the winter of 2013–2014 at
Filefjell, Norway, and the other an idealized synthetic data set. Model results using
the Richards routine generally lead to higher water contents in the snow
layers. Snow layers often reached a point at which the ice crystals' surface area
is completely covered by a thin film of water (the transition between
pendular and funicular regimes), at which feedback from the snow metamorphism
and compaction routines are expected to be nonlinear. With the synthetic
simulation 18 % of snow layers obtained a saturation of > 10 % and
0.57 % of layers reached saturation of > 15 %. The Richards
routine had a maximum liquid water content of 173.6 kg m<sup>−3</sup> whereas the
bucket routine had a maximum of 42.1 kg m<sup>−3</sup>. We found that wet-snow
processes, such as wet-snow metamorphism and wet-snow compaction rates, are
not accurately represented at higher water contents. These routines feed back
on the Richards routines, which rely heavily on grain size and snow density.
The parameter sets for the water retention curve and hydraulic conductivity
of snow layers, which are used in the Richards routine, do not represent all
the snow types that can be found in a natural snowpack. We show that the new
routine has been implemented in the Crocus model, but due to feedback
amplification and parameter uncertainties, meaningful applicability is
limited. Updating or adapting other routines in Crocus, specifically the snow
compaction routine and the grain metamorphism routine, is needed before
Crocus can accurately simulate the snowpack using the Richards routine. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1991-959X 1991-9603 |