The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17

The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17

In its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria Fanou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2020-08-01
Series:Europe and the World
Online Access:https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26
id doaj-0f3905cfcd074d63b68abb82e372f80e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f3905cfcd074d63b68abb82e372f80e2020-12-16T09:48:07ZengUCL PressEurope and the World2399-28752020-08-0110.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17Maria FanouIn its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of the main challenges for the rule of law in the EU, this article discusses the Court’s findings in relation to the compatibility of the ICS with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal.https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Fanou
spellingShingle Maria Fanou
The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
Europe and the World
author_facet Maria Fanou
author_sort Maria Fanou
title The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
title_short The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
title_full The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
title_fullStr The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
title_full_unstemmed The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17
title_sort independence and impartiality of the hybrid ceta investment court system: reflections in the aftermath of opinion 1/17
publisher UCL Press
series Europe and the World
issn 2399-2875
publishDate 2020-08-01
description In its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of the main challenges for the rule of law in the EU, this article discusses the Court’s findings in relation to the compatibility of the ICS with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal.
url https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26
work_keys_str_mv AT mariafanou theindependenceandimpartialityofthehybridcetainvestmentcourtsystemreflectionsintheaftermathofopinion117
AT mariafanou independenceandimpartialityofthehybridcetainvestmentcourtsystemreflectionsintheaftermathofopinion117
_version_ 1724381103666495488

Similar Items