Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations

The increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Judy You Rong Tan, Tania B. Huedo-Medina, Carter A. Lennon, Angela C. White, Blair T. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bielefeld 2010-11-01
Series:International Journal of Conflict and Violence
Online Access:https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2832
id doaj-0f362e3c002947fb9bd3d355ec60f02e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f362e3c002947fb9bd3d355ec60f02e2020-11-25T01:27:49ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852010-11-014210.4119/ijcv-2832Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup RelationsJudy You Rong Tan0Tania B. Huedo-Medina1Carter A. Lennon2Angela C. White3Blair T. Johnson4University of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutThe increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of the historical causes and courses of inter-group conflict in current comparative approaches. Meta-analytic methods offer researchers the ability to combine data from studies with groups as well as across time. Our review of statistical methods available for comparative analyses in inter-group research found strengths and limitations for understanding group differences, conflict, and violence, and meta-analytic methods address these limitations by exploring potential structural-level moderators and by identifying how temporal and geographical variations may relate directly to group-based variables. Such methods can contribute to our understanding of broad structural effects on group-based variables by elucidating the mechanisms underlying them.https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2832
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Judy You Rong Tan
Tania B. Huedo-Medina
Carter A. Lennon
Angela C. White
Blair T. Johnson
spellingShingle Judy You Rong Tan
Tania B. Huedo-Medina
Carter A. Lennon
Angela C. White
Blair T. Johnson
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
International Journal of Conflict and Violence
author_facet Judy You Rong Tan
Tania B. Huedo-Medina
Carter A. Lennon
Angela C. White
Blair T. Johnson
author_sort Judy You Rong Tan
title Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
title_short Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
title_full Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
title_fullStr Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
title_full_unstemmed Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
title_sort us versus them in context: meta-analysis as a tool for geotemporal trends in intergroup relations
publisher University of Bielefeld
series International Journal of Conflict and Violence
issn 1864-1385
publishDate 2010-11-01
description The increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of the historical causes and courses of inter-group conflict in current comparative approaches. Meta-analytic methods offer researchers the ability to combine data from studies with groups as well as across time. Our review of statistical methods available for comparative analyses in inter-group research found strengths and limitations for understanding group differences, conflict, and violence, and meta-analytic methods address these limitations by exploring potential structural-level moderators and by identifying how temporal and geographical variations may relate directly to group-based variables. Such methods can contribute to our understanding of broad structural effects on group-based variables by elucidating the mechanisms underlying them.
url https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2832
work_keys_str_mv AT judyyourongtan usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations
AT taniabhuedomedina usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations
AT carteralennon usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations
AT angelacwhite usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations
AT blairtjohnson usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations
_version_ 1725102992665870336