Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
The increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Bielefeld
2010-11-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Conflict and Violence |
Online Access: | https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2832 |
id |
doaj-0f362e3c002947fb9bd3d355ec60f02e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0f362e3c002947fb9bd3d355ec60f02e2020-11-25T01:27:49ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852010-11-014210.4119/ijcv-2832Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup RelationsJudy You Rong Tan0Tania B. Huedo-Medina1Carter A. Lennon2Angela C. White3Blair T. Johnson4University of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of ConnecticutThe increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of the historical causes and courses of inter-group conflict in current comparative approaches. Meta-analytic methods offer researchers the ability to combine data from studies with groups as well as across time. Our review of statistical methods available for comparative analyses in inter-group research found strengths and limitations for understanding group differences, conflict, and violence, and meta-analytic methods address these limitations by exploring potential structural-level moderators and by identifying how temporal and geographical variations may relate directly to group-based variables. Such methods can contribute to our understanding of broad structural effects on group-based variables by elucidating the mechanisms underlying them.https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2832 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Judy You Rong Tan Tania B. Huedo-Medina Carter A. Lennon Angela C. White Blair T. Johnson |
spellingShingle |
Judy You Rong Tan Tania B. Huedo-Medina Carter A. Lennon Angela C. White Blair T. Johnson Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations International Journal of Conflict and Violence |
author_facet |
Judy You Rong Tan Tania B. Huedo-Medina Carter A. Lennon Angela C. White Blair T. Johnson |
author_sort |
Judy You Rong Tan |
title |
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations |
title_short |
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations |
title_full |
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations |
title_fullStr |
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations |
title_sort |
us versus them in context: meta-analysis as a tool for geotemporal trends in intergroup relations |
publisher |
University of Bielefeld |
series |
International Journal of Conflict and Violence |
issn |
1864-1385 |
publishDate |
2010-11-01 |
description |
The increasing availability of studies from many nations offers important potential insights into group-based psychology and behavior, conflict, and violence. Nonetheless, to date, few cross-national or cultural comparisons of study findings have been made, representing a gap in our understanding of the historical causes and courses of inter-group conflict in current comparative approaches. Meta-analytic methods offer researchers the ability to combine data from studies with groups as well as across time. Our review of statistical methods available for comparative analyses in inter-group research found strengths and limitations for understanding group differences, conflict, and violence, and meta-analytic methods address these limitations by exploring potential structural-level moderators and by identifying how temporal and geographical variations may relate directly to group-based variables. Such methods can contribute to our understanding of broad structural effects on group-based variables by elucidating the mechanisms underlying them. |
url |
https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2832 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT judyyourongtan usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations AT taniabhuedomedina usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations AT carteralennon usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations AT angelacwhite usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations AT blairtjohnson usversusthemincontextmetaanalysisasatoolforgeotemporaltrendsinintergrouprelations |
_version_ |
1725102992665870336 |