Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units

<b>Introduction:</b> Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) have shown to be a source of <i>Legionella</i> infection. We report the experience of different dental healthcare settings where a risk management plan was implemented. <b>Materials and methods:</b> In a Hospital...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedetta Tuvo, Michele Totaro, Maria Luisa Cristina, Anna Maria Spagnolo, David Di Cave, Sara Profeti, Angelo Baggiani, Gaetano Privitera, Beatrice Casini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/4/305
id doaj-0f3500ca4ab94548828303d9058e179d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f3500ca4ab94548828303d9058e179d2020-11-25T02:27:25ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172020-04-01930530510.3390/pathogens9040305Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental UnitsBenedetta Tuvo0Michele Totaro1Maria Luisa Cristina2Anna Maria Spagnolo3David Di Cave4Sara Profeti5Angelo Baggiani6Gaetano Privitera7Beatrice Casini8Department of Translational Research, N.T.M.S., University of Pisa, 56123 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Translational Research, N.T.M.S., University of Pisa, 56123 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, ItalyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, ItalyDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Translational Research, N.T.M.S., University of Pisa, 56123 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Translational Research, N.T.M.S., University of Pisa, 56123 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Translational Research, N.T.M.S., University of Pisa, 56123 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Translational Research, N.T.M.S., University of Pisa, 56123 Pisa, Italy<b>Introduction:</b> Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) have shown to be a source of <i>Legionella</i> infection. We report the experience of different dental healthcare settings where a risk management plan was implemented. <b>Materials and methods:</b> In a Hospital Odontostomatology Clinic (HOC) and three Private Dental Clinics (PDCs) housing 13 and six dental units (DUs), respectively, an assessment checklist was applied to evaluate staff compliance with guideline recommendations. DUWLs microbial parameters were investigated before and after the application of corrective actions. <b>Results:</b> In the HOC a poor adherence to good practices was demonstrated, whereas protocols were carefully applied in PDCs. <i>L. pneumophila</i> sg 2–15 was isolated in 31% (4/13) and 33% (2/6) of DUs in HOC and PDCs, respectively, mainly from handpieces (32%, 6/19) with counts >10<sup>2</sup> colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/L), often associated with <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (68%, 13/19). The shock disinfection with 3% v/v hydrogen peroxide (HP) showed a limited effect, with a recolonization period of about 4 weeks. <i>Legionella</i> was eradicated only after 6% v/v HP shock disinfection and filters-installation, whilst <i>P. aeruginosa</i> after the third shock disinfection with a solution of 4% v/v HP and biodegradable surfactants. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our data demonstrate the presence and persistence of microbial contamination within the DUWLs, which required strict adherence to control measures and the choice of effective disinfectants.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/4/305Dental unit waterlines<i>Legionella</i> spp.risk managementdisinfection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benedetta Tuvo
Michele Totaro
Maria Luisa Cristina
Anna Maria Spagnolo
David Di Cave
Sara Profeti
Angelo Baggiani
Gaetano Privitera
Beatrice Casini
spellingShingle Benedetta Tuvo
Michele Totaro
Maria Luisa Cristina
Anna Maria Spagnolo
David Di Cave
Sara Profeti
Angelo Baggiani
Gaetano Privitera
Beatrice Casini
Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units
Pathogens
Dental unit waterlines
<i>Legionella</i> spp.
risk management
disinfection
author_facet Benedetta Tuvo
Michele Totaro
Maria Luisa Cristina
Anna Maria Spagnolo
David Di Cave
Sara Profeti
Angelo Baggiani
Gaetano Privitera
Beatrice Casini
author_sort Benedetta Tuvo
title Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_short Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_full Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_fullStr Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_full_unstemmed Prevention and Control of <i>Legionella</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. Colonization in Dental Units
title_sort prevention and control of <i>legionella</i> and <i>pseudomonas</i> spp. colonization in dental units
publisher MDPI AG
series Pathogens
issn 2076-0817
publishDate 2020-04-01
description <b>Introduction:</b> Dental Unit Waterlines (DUWLs) have shown to be a source of <i>Legionella</i> infection. We report the experience of different dental healthcare settings where a risk management plan was implemented. <b>Materials and methods:</b> In a Hospital Odontostomatology Clinic (HOC) and three Private Dental Clinics (PDCs) housing 13 and six dental units (DUs), respectively, an assessment checklist was applied to evaluate staff compliance with guideline recommendations. DUWLs microbial parameters were investigated before and after the application of corrective actions. <b>Results:</b> In the HOC a poor adherence to good practices was demonstrated, whereas protocols were carefully applied in PDCs. <i>L. pneumophila</i> sg 2–15 was isolated in 31% (4/13) and 33% (2/6) of DUs in HOC and PDCs, respectively, mainly from handpieces (32%, 6/19) with counts >10<sup>2</sup> colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/L), often associated with <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (68%, 13/19). The shock disinfection with 3% v/v hydrogen peroxide (HP) showed a limited effect, with a recolonization period of about 4 weeks. <i>Legionella</i> was eradicated only after 6% v/v HP shock disinfection and filters-installation, whilst <i>P. aeruginosa</i> after the third shock disinfection with a solution of 4% v/v HP and biodegradable surfactants. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our data demonstrate the presence and persistence of microbial contamination within the DUWLs, which required strict adherence to control measures and the choice of effective disinfectants.
topic Dental unit waterlines
<i>Legionella</i> spp.
risk management
disinfection
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/4/305
work_keys_str_mv AT benedettatuvo preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT micheletotaro preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT marialuisacristina preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT annamariaspagnolo preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT daviddicave preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT saraprofeti preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT angelobaggiani preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT gaetanoprivitera preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
AT beatricecasini preventionandcontrolofilegionellaiandipseudomonasisppcolonizationindentalunits
_version_ 1724843281863409664