Precipitation <i>δ</i>¹⁸O on the Himalaya–Tibet orogeny and its relationship to surface elevation

• Main Authors: H. Shen, C. J. Poulsen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-01-01
• Series: Climate of the Past
• Online Access: https://www.clim-past.net/15/169/2019/cp-15-169-2019.pdf

<p>The elevation history of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen is central to understanding the evolution and dynamics of both the India–Asia collision and the Asian monsoons. The surface elevation history of the region is largely deduced from stable isotope (<span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>D</span>) paleoaltimetry. This method is based on the observed relationship between the isotopic composition of meteoric waters (<span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>D</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span>) and surface elevation, and the assumption that precipitation undergoes Rayleigh distillation under forced ascent. Here we evaluate how elevation-induced climate change influences the <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span>–elevation relationship and whether Rayleigh distillation is the dominant process affecting <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span>. We use an isotope-enabled climate model, ECHAM-wiso, to show that the Rayleigh distillation process is only dominant in the monsoonal regions of the Himalayas when the mountains are high. When the orogen is lowered, local surface recycling and convective processes become important, as forced ascent is weakened due to weaker Asian monsoons. As a result, the <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span> lapse rate in the Himalayas increases from around <span class="inline-formula">−3</span> to above <span class="inline-formula">−</span>0.1&thinsp;‰&thinsp;km<span class="inline-formula">⁻¹</span>, and has little relationship with elevation. On the Tibetan Plateau, the meridional gradient of <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span> decreases from <span class="inline-formula">∼1</span> to <span class="inline-formula">∼0.3</span>&thinsp;‰&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">^∘</span><span class="inline-formula">⁻¹</span> with reduced elevation, primarily due to enhanced sub-cloud reevaporation under lower relative humidity. Overall, we report that using <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span> or <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>D</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span> to deduce surface elevation change in the Himalayan–Tibetan region has severe limitations and demonstrate that the processes that control annual-mean precipitation-weighted <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span><span class="inline-formula">_p</span> vary by region and with surface elevation. In summary, we determine that the application of <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span> paleoaltimetry is only appropriate for 7 of the 50 sites from which <span class="inline-formula"><i>δ</i>¹⁸O</span> records have been used to infer past elevations.</p>