Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients

Background and purpose — Until now, there have been no studies beyond 30 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We report knee function a mean 31 years after ACL reconstruction. Patients and methods — This cohort comprised a case series of 60 patients with a mean follow-up of 3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Söderman, Suzanne Werner, Marie-Louise Wretling, Mari Hänni, Christina Mikkelsen, Anders Sundin, Adel Shalabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-07-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1959709
id doaj-0f25bd6763b94c2696fb01618f474019
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f25bd6763b94c2696fb01618f4740192021-08-09T15:50:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822021-07-01001610.1080/17453674.2021.19597091959709Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patientsThomas Söderman0Suzanne Werner1Marie-Louise Wretling2Mari Hänni3Christina Mikkelsen4Anders Sundin5Adel Shalabi6Department of Radiology, Institution of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska HospitalDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Institution of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska HospitalDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Radiology, Institution of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Institution of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska HospitalBackground and purpose — Until now, there have been no studies beyond 30 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We report knee function a mean 31 years after ACL reconstruction. Patients and methods — This cohort comprised a case series of 60 patients with a mean follow-up of 31 years (28–33) after ACL reconstruction. Patients were evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective assessment, Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, radiography, and MRI. Results — 30 patients showed an intact ACL graft and 30 a ruptured or missing ACL graft. 40 patients had osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment and 24 patients in the patellofemoral compartment. Patients with intact ACL grafts scored higher than those with ruptured or missing ACL grafts when it comes to KOOS Sport/Rec. The Hodges Lehmann estimated median difference between groups was 15 (95% CI 0–35). The KOOS scores were lower in the group with ruptured or missing ACL grafts when compared with a healthy-knee reference group of males in terms of Pain, mean difference –8 (CI –15 to –1), Symptoms, mean difference –18 (CI –27 to –9), and Sport/Rec, mean difference –21 (CI –34 to –8). In the group with intact ACL grafts, the KOOS score was lower than a healthy-knee reference group of males in terms of Symptoms, mean difference –12 (CI –21 to –3). Scores for all subgroups of KOOS were higher in patients without osteoarthritis. The IKDC overall clinical assessment outcome was worse in patients with a ruptured or missing ACL graft. The Hodges Lehmann estimated median difference between groups was 1 (CI 0–1). Interpretation — Patients with an intact ACL graft reported higher sports activity and recreation, as measured with KOOS, than patients with a ruptured or missing ACL graft. Patients with severe osteoarthritis reported lower sports activity and recreation, as measured with KOOS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1959709
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Söderman
Suzanne Werner
Marie-Louise Wretling
Mari Hänni
Christina Mikkelsen
Anders Sundin
Adel Shalabi
spellingShingle Thomas Söderman
Suzanne Werner
Marie-Louise Wretling
Mari Hänni
Christina Mikkelsen
Anders Sundin
Adel Shalabi
Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
Acta Orthopaedica
author_facet Thomas Söderman
Suzanne Werner
Marie-Louise Wretling
Mari Hänni
Christina Mikkelsen
Anders Sundin
Adel Shalabi
author_sort Thomas Söderman
title Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
title_short Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
title_full Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
title_fullStr Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
title_full_unstemmed Knee function 30 years after ACL reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
title_sort knee function 30 years after acl reconstruction: a case series of 60 patients
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Acta Orthopaedica
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background and purpose — Until now, there have been no studies beyond 30 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We report knee function a mean 31 years after ACL reconstruction. Patients and methods — This cohort comprised a case series of 60 patients with a mean follow-up of 31 years (28–33) after ACL reconstruction. Patients were evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective assessment, Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, radiography, and MRI. Results — 30 patients showed an intact ACL graft and 30 a ruptured or missing ACL graft. 40 patients had osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment and 24 patients in the patellofemoral compartment. Patients with intact ACL grafts scored higher than those with ruptured or missing ACL grafts when it comes to KOOS Sport/Rec. The Hodges Lehmann estimated median difference between groups was 15 (95% CI 0–35). The KOOS scores were lower in the group with ruptured or missing ACL grafts when compared with a healthy-knee reference group of males in terms of Pain, mean difference –8 (CI –15 to –1), Symptoms, mean difference –18 (CI –27 to –9), and Sport/Rec, mean difference –21 (CI –34 to –8). In the group with intact ACL grafts, the KOOS score was lower than a healthy-knee reference group of males in terms of Symptoms, mean difference –12 (CI –21 to –3). Scores for all subgroups of KOOS were higher in patients without osteoarthritis. The IKDC overall clinical assessment outcome was worse in patients with a ruptured or missing ACL graft. The Hodges Lehmann estimated median difference between groups was 1 (CI 0–1). Interpretation — Patients with an intact ACL graft reported higher sports activity and recreation, as measured with KOOS, than patients with a ruptured or missing ACL graft. Patients with severe osteoarthritis reported lower sports activity and recreation, as measured with KOOS.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1959709
work_keys_str_mv AT thomassoderman kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
AT suzannewerner kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
AT marielouisewretling kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
AT marihanni kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
AT christinamikkelsen kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
AT anderssundin kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
AT adelshalabi kneefunction30yearsafteraclreconstructionacaseseriesof60patients
_version_ 1721213723833532416