Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males

This study aimed to report penile dimensions in adult Egyptian males consulting for small-sized penis (SSP) and describe their demographics and andrological profile. A case control study was designed through retrospective data analysis of patients ( n = 239) seeking advice for SSP and a control grou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nader Salama MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-05-01
Series:American Journal of Men's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988314565167
id doaj-0f2341459c1a46d6b05987666327522b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f2341459c1a46d6b05987666327522b2020-11-25T03:32:21ZengSAGE PublishingAmerican Journal of Men's Health1557-98831557-98912016-05-011010.1177/1557988314565167Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian MalesNader Salama MD, PhD0Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, EgyptThis study aimed to report penile dimensions in adult Egyptian males consulting for small-sized penis (SSP) and describe their demographics and andrological profile. A case control study was designed through retrospective data analysis of patients ( n = 239) seeking advice for SSP and a control group ( n = 59). This included sociodemographics, other andrological complaints, and penile dimensions (pendulous length [PL], penopubic or total length [TL], and circumference [CF]) at flaccid and erect states and the size of the prepubic fatty pad. The results reported that most patients were single, students, and smokers and had not completed a university education. Several patients reported falsely premature ejaculation (PE), penile curvature (PC), and small-sized testes. Most penile dimensions of the patients (mean, cm) were significantly lower than those of the controls, whether in flaccid (PL: 7.4 vs. 8.05, p = .008; CF: 8.7 vs. 8.98, p = .026) or erect state (PL: 11.8 vs. 13, p = .000; TL: 14.2 vs. 15, p = .000; CF: 11.3 vs. 11.8, p = .003). However, no patient presented with a pendulous penile length <4 cm in flaccid or <7 cm in erect state. In conclusion, Egyptian men consulting for SSP did not have true small organs, but their penile dimensions were slightly smaller than those of men without such complaint. The proper sexual education program is highly advisable in these situations to avoid the myths and misconceptions about sexuality.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988314565167
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nader Salama MD, PhD
spellingShingle Nader Salama MD, PhD
Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
American Journal of Men's Health
author_facet Nader Salama MD, PhD
author_sort Nader Salama MD, PhD
title Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
title_short Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
title_full Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
title_fullStr Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
title_full_unstemmed Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
title_sort consultation for small-sized penis in the egyptian males
publisher SAGE Publishing
series American Journal of Men's Health
issn 1557-9883
1557-9891
publishDate 2016-05-01
description This study aimed to report penile dimensions in adult Egyptian males consulting for small-sized penis (SSP) and describe their demographics and andrological profile. A case control study was designed through retrospective data analysis of patients ( n = 239) seeking advice for SSP and a control group ( n = 59). This included sociodemographics, other andrological complaints, and penile dimensions (pendulous length [PL], penopubic or total length [TL], and circumference [CF]) at flaccid and erect states and the size of the prepubic fatty pad. The results reported that most patients were single, students, and smokers and had not completed a university education. Several patients reported falsely premature ejaculation (PE), penile curvature (PC), and small-sized testes. Most penile dimensions of the patients (mean, cm) were significantly lower than those of the controls, whether in flaccid (PL: 7.4 vs. 8.05, p = .008; CF: 8.7 vs. 8.98, p = .026) or erect state (PL: 11.8 vs. 13, p = .000; TL: 14.2 vs. 15, p = .000; CF: 11.3 vs. 11.8, p = .003). However, no patient presented with a pendulous penile length <4 cm in flaccid or <7 cm in erect state. In conclusion, Egyptian men consulting for SSP did not have true small organs, but their penile dimensions were slightly smaller than those of men without such complaint. The proper sexual education program is highly advisable in these situations to avoid the myths and misconceptions about sexuality.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988314565167
work_keys_str_mv AT nadersalamamdphd consultationforsmallsizedpenisintheegyptianmales
_version_ 1724569008356720640