Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016

Abstract Background The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) estimates the number of forcibly displaced people increased from 22.7 million people in 1996 to 67.7 million people in 2016. Human mobility is associated with the introduction of infectious disease pathogens. The aim of this study was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angel N. Desai, John W. Ramatowski, Nina Marano, Lawrence C. Madoff, Britta Lassmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:Conflict and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13031-020-00295-9
id doaj-0f20cbef684f4763964c0adf2b4aff07
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f20cbef684f4763964c0adf2b4aff072020-11-25T03:28:19ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052020-07-0114111010.1186/s13031-020-00295-9Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016Angel N. Desai0John W. Ramatowski1Nina Marano2Lawrence C. Madoff3Britta Lassmann4International Society for Infectious DiseasesInternational Society for Infectious DiseasesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionInternational Society for Infectious DiseasesInternational Society for Infectious DiseasesAbstract Background The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) estimates the number of forcibly displaced people increased from 22.7 million people in 1996 to 67.7 million people in 2016. Human mobility is associated with the introduction of infectious disease pathogens. The aim of this study was to describe the range of pathogens in forcibly displaced populations over time using an informal event monitoring system. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of ProMED, a digital disease monitoring system, to identify reports of outbreak events involving forcibly displaced populations between 1996 and 2016. Number of outbreak events per year was tabulated. Each record was assessed to determine outbreak location, pathogen, origin of persons implicated in the outbreak, and suspected versus confirmed case counts. Results One hundred twenty-eight independent outbreak events involving forcibly displaced populations were identified. Over 840,000 confirmed or suspected cases of infectious diseases such as measles, cholera, cutaneous leishmaniasis, dengue, and others were reported in 48 destination countries/territories. The average rate of outbreak events concerning forcibly displaced persons per total number of reports published on ProMED per year increased over time. The majority of outbreak events (63%) were due to acquisition of disease in the destination country. Conclusion This study found that reports of outbreak events involving forcibly displaced populations have increased in ProMED. The events and outbreaks detected in this retrospective review underscore the importance of capturing displaced populations in surveillance systems for rapid detection and response.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13031-020-00295-9SurveillanceForced displacementOutbreakInfectious disease, ProMED
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angel N. Desai
John W. Ramatowski
Nina Marano
Lawrence C. Madoff
Britta Lassmann
spellingShingle Angel N. Desai
John W. Ramatowski
Nina Marano
Lawrence C. Madoff
Britta Lassmann
Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016
Conflict and Health
Surveillance
Forced displacement
Outbreak
Infectious disease, ProMED
author_facet Angel N. Desai
John W. Ramatowski
Nina Marano
Lawrence C. Madoff
Britta Lassmann
author_sort Angel N. Desai
title Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016
title_short Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016
title_full Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016
title_fullStr Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016
title_full_unstemmed Infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of ProMED reports 1996–2016
title_sort infectious disease outbreaks among forcibly displaced persons: an analysis of promed reports 1996–2016
publisher BMC
series Conflict and Health
issn 1752-1505
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) estimates the number of forcibly displaced people increased from 22.7 million people in 1996 to 67.7 million people in 2016. Human mobility is associated with the introduction of infectious disease pathogens. The aim of this study was to describe the range of pathogens in forcibly displaced populations over time using an informal event monitoring system. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of ProMED, a digital disease monitoring system, to identify reports of outbreak events involving forcibly displaced populations between 1996 and 2016. Number of outbreak events per year was tabulated. Each record was assessed to determine outbreak location, pathogen, origin of persons implicated in the outbreak, and suspected versus confirmed case counts. Results One hundred twenty-eight independent outbreak events involving forcibly displaced populations were identified. Over 840,000 confirmed or suspected cases of infectious diseases such as measles, cholera, cutaneous leishmaniasis, dengue, and others were reported in 48 destination countries/territories. The average rate of outbreak events concerning forcibly displaced persons per total number of reports published on ProMED per year increased over time. The majority of outbreak events (63%) were due to acquisition of disease in the destination country. Conclusion This study found that reports of outbreak events involving forcibly displaced populations have increased in ProMED. The events and outbreaks detected in this retrospective review underscore the importance of capturing displaced populations in surveillance systems for rapid detection and response.
topic Surveillance
Forced displacement
Outbreak
Infectious disease, ProMED
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13031-020-00295-9
work_keys_str_mv AT angelndesai infectiousdiseaseoutbreaksamongforciblydisplacedpersonsananalysisofpromedreports19962016
AT johnwramatowski infectiousdiseaseoutbreaksamongforciblydisplacedpersonsananalysisofpromedreports19962016
AT ninamarano infectiousdiseaseoutbreaksamongforciblydisplacedpersonsananalysisofpromedreports19962016
AT lawrencecmadoff infectiousdiseaseoutbreaksamongforciblydisplacedpersonsananalysisofpromedreports19962016
AT brittalassmann infectiousdiseaseoutbreaksamongforciblydisplacedpersonsananalysisofpromedreports19962016
_version_ 1724584948812218368