The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals have begun publishing peer review reports. Here, the authors show how this policy shift affects reviewer behavior by analyzing data from five journals piloting open peer review.
Main Authors: | Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Emilia López-Iñesta, Bahar Mehmani, Flaminio Squazzoni |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2 |
Similar Items
-
Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015).
by: Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Exit, punishment and rewards in commons dilemmas: an experimental study.
by: Giangiacomo Bravo, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports
by: Ivan Buljan, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Scholarly Journal Publishing
by: Kraft, Donald H.
Published: (2006) -
The difficulties of Polish scholars trying to publish in international peer-reviewed journals
by: Kijak, Magdalena
Published: (2014)