Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change

For two bituminous coal-fired power plants with 500 MW and pulverized coal combustion type, the concentration of PMtotal, >PM10, PM2.5-10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 was measured, and their emission factors were calculated through field measurement. The measurement points started from the boiler downstr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JeongHun Yu, Jihan Song, DoYoung Lee, MyeongSang Yu, JongHan Jung, Sung-Nam Chun, GaYoung Lee, JongHo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian Association for Atmospheric Environment 2021-09-01
Series:Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2021.104
id doaj-0f1565714c274a8fb365f47c23aa859e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f1565714c274a8fb365f47c23aa859e2021-09-28T05:21:07ZengAsian Association for Atmospheric EnvironmentAsian Journal of Atmospheric Environment1976-69122287-11602021-09-0115311010.5572/ajae.2021.104Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load ChangeJeongHun Yu0Jihan Song1DoYoung Lee2MyeongSang Yu3JongHan Jung4Sung-Nam Chun5GaYoung Lee6JongHo Kim7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0496-4814Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of KoreaEnvironmental Research Center, Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of KoreaEnvironmental Research Center, Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of KoreaClean Power Generation Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Research Institute, Daejeon, Republic of KoreaClean Power Generation Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Research Institute, Daejeon, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Infra-System (Environment Engineering), Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of KoreaFor two bituminous coal-fired power plants with 500 MW and pulverized coal combustion type, the concentration of PMtotal, >PM10, PM2.5-10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 was measured, and their emission factors were calculated through field measurement. The measurement points started from the boiler downstream and continued to the air pollution control devices (APCDs) that are installed in series, namely, the selected catalytic reduction system (SCR), air preheater (APH), electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and wet flue gas desulfurization system (WFGD). The measurement was performed at one point for more than three times by using the Korean standard method for air pollutants. However, all measurement points, except for the stacks, were not representative of the standard test method. In addition, the PM concentration was too high to reduce the collection time due to isokinetic sampling. There is a limitation of how representative the measurement results can be. During the field measurement period, the power production rate of the two coal-fired power plants was 91.6% and 79.2% in the P-1 and P-2, respectively. Moreover, in the P-2, with a low power production rate, the concentration of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, and NOx was found to be low, and the emission factor calculated by dividing the measured concentration value by the fuel usage was also estimated to be low. Such results are due to the coal combustion chamber and various types of APCD being operated at a lower-load condition than the design capacity. In turn, the number of pollutants generated was less, and the removal efficiency of the pollutant became high. However, it was found that the concentration of SO2 generated and the emission factor are more significantly affected by the sulfur content of the coal than the load factor change. To this end, reducing the operation load of the coal-fired power plant improves the combustion efficiency and APCDs performance and decreases the emission factor, resulting in more reduction of the air pollutants than that based on the simple calculation.https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2021.104coal-fired power plantemission factorair pollution control devicesparticle size distributionupper limit restrictions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author JeongHun Yu
Jihan Song
DoYoung Lee
MyeongSang Yu
JongHan Jung
Sung-Nam Chun
GaYoung Lee
JongHo Kim
spellingShingle JeongHun Yu
Jihan Song
DoYoung Lee
MyeongSang Yu
JongHan Jung
Sung-Nam Chun
GaYoung Lee
JongHo Kim
Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
coal-fired power plant
emission factor
air pollution control devices
particle size distribution
upper limit restrictions
author_facet JeongHun Yu
Jihan Song
DoYoung Lee
MyeongSang Yu
JongHan Jung
Sung-Nam Chun
GaYoung Lee
JongHo Kim
author_sort JeongHun Yu
title Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change
title_short Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change
title_full Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change
title_fullStr Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 Emission Factors from Coal-fired Power Plants per Load Change
title_sort comparison of pmtotal, pm10, pm2.5, nox, and so2 emission factors from coal-fired power plants per load change
publisher Asian Association for Atmospheric Environment
series Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
issn 1976-6912
2287-1160
publishDate 2021-09-01
description For two bituminous coal-fired power plants with 500 MW and pulverized coal combustion type, the concentration of PMtotal, >PM10, PM2.5-10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2 was measured, and their emission factors were calculated through field measurement. The measurement points started from the boiler downstream and continued to the air pollution control devices (APCDs) that are installed in series, namely, the selected catalytic reduction system (SCR), air preheater (APH), electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and wet flue gas desulfurization system (WFGD). The measurement was performed at one point for more than three times by using the Korean standard method for air pollutants. However, all measurement points, except for the stacks, were not representative of the standard test method. In addition, the PM concentration was too high to reduce the collection time due to isokinetic sampling. There is a limitation of how representative the measurement results can be. During the field measurement period, the power production rate of the two coal-fired power plants was 91.6% and 79.2% in the P-1 and P-2, respectively. Moreover, in the P-2, with a low power production rate, the concentration of PMtotal, PM10, PM2.5, and NOx was found to be low, and the emission factor calculated by dividing the measured concentration value by the fuel usage was also estimated to be low. Such results are due to the coal combustion chamber and various types of APCD being operated at a lower-load condition than the design capacity. In turn, the number of pollutants generated was less, and the removal efficiency of the pollutant became high. However, it was found that the concentration of SO2 generated and the emission factor are more significantly affected by the sulfur content of the coal than the load factor change. To this end, reducing the operation load of the coal-fired power plant improves the combustion efficiency and APCDs performance and decreases the emission factor, resulting in more reduction of the air pollutants than that based on the simple calculation.
topic coal-fired power plant
emission factor
air pollution control devices
particle size distribution
upper limit restrictions
url https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2021.104
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonghunyu comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT jihansong comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT doyounglee comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT myeongsangyu comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT jonghanjung comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT sungnamchun comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT gayounglee comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
AT jonghokim comparisonofpmtotalpm10pm25noxandso2emissionfactorsfromcoalfiredpowerplantsperloadchange
_version_ 1716866378657431552