Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance

Collusion can increase the transaction value among supply chain members to obtain higher loans from supply chain finance (SCF) service provider, which will bring some serious risks for SCF. However, it is difficult to be identified and restrain the SCF service provider due to its stability and hidde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiang Wei, Xinyu Gou, Tianyu Deng, Chunguang Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5554501
id doaj-0f0f75aa97ce4b47b068cf128e9e0f57
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f0f75aa97ce4b47b068cf128e9e0f572021-06-21T02:24:41ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1099-05262021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5554501Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain FinanceQiang Wei0Xinyu Gou1Tianyu Deng2Chunguang Bai3School of Management and EconomicsSchool of Business AdministrationBusiness SchoolSchool of Management and EconomicsCollusion can increase the transaction value among supply chain members to obtain higher loans from supply chain finance (SCF) service provider, which will bring some serious risks for SCF. However, it is difficult to be identified and restrain the SCF service provider due to its stability and hiddenness. Different SCF transaction structures will affect the profits of supply chain members from collusion. This paper develops various game models for collusion and not collusion for different SCF transaction structures and investigates the impact of SCF transaction structures on the boundary conditions of collusion. Through comparative analysis, the findings of models are as follows: (1) in a two-echelon supply chain, the supplier and retailer are more likely to conduct collusion under the sequential game than under the simultaneous game; (2) collusion in the two-echelon supply chain can obtain higher loans than that in the three-echelon supply chain, so it has more serious hidden danger; (3) in the two-echelon supply chain, collusion is easier to form than in the three-echelon SCF supply chain that has spontaneous endogenous constraints. We also develop two types of mechanisms to restrain collusion behavior from profit sharing and incomplete information perspectives. Finally, we summarize the theoretical implications and analyze the management implications through a case study.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5554501
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiang Wei
Xinyu Gou
Tianyu Deng
Chunguang Bai
spellingShingle Qiang Wei
Xinyu Gou
Tianyu Deng
Chunguang Bai
Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance
Complexity
author_facet Qiang Wei
Xinyu Gou
Tianyu Deng
Chunguang Bai
author_sort Qiang Wei
title Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance
title_short Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance
title_full Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance
title_fullStr Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance
title_full_unstemmed Restrain Price Collusion in Trade-Based Supply Chain Finance
title_sort restrain price collusion in trade-based supply chain finance
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Complexity
issn 1099-0526
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Collusion can increase the transaction value among supply chain members to obtain higher loans from supply chain finance (SCF) service provider, which will bring some serious risks for SCF. However, it is difficult to be identified and restrain the SCF service provider due to its stability and hiddenness. Different SCF transaction structures will affect the profits of supply chain members from collusion. This paper develops various game models for collusion and not collusion for different SCF transaction structures and investigates the impact of SCF transaction structures on the boundary conditions of collusion. Through comparative analysis, the findings of models are as follows: (1) in a two-echelon supply chain, the supplier and retailer are more likely to conduct collusion under the sequential game than under the simultaneous game; (2) collusion in the two-echelon supply chain can obtain higher loans than that in the three-echelon supply chain, so it has more serious hidden danger; (3) in the two-echelon supply chain, collusion is easier to form than in the three-echelon SCF supply chain that has spontaneous endogenous constraints. We also develop two types of mechanisms to restrain collusion behavior from profit sharing and incomplete information perspectives. Finally, we summarize the theoretical implications and analyze the management implications through a case study.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5554501
work_keys_str_mv AT qiangwei restrainpricecollusionintradebasedsupplychainfinance
AT xinyugou restrainpricecollusionintradebasedsupplychainfinance
AT tianyudeng restrainpricecollusionintradebasedsupplychainfinance
AT chunguangbai restrainpricecollusionintradebasedsupplychainfinance
_version_ 1721369189854216192