Treatment optimisation in patients with functional Class II chronic heart failure and arterial hypertension

• Main Authors: S. G. Kanorskyi, V. G. Tregubov, V. M. Pokrovskyi, N. A. Bulozhenko
• Format: Article
• Language: Russian
• Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2012-04-01
• Series: Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
• Subjects: chronic heart failure; metoprolol succinate; quinapril; cardio-respiratory synchronism; regulatory and adaptive status
• Online Access: https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1765

Aim.To identify the optimal treatment tactics in patients with Functional Class (FC) II chronic heart failure (CHF) (NYHA classification) and essential arterial hypertension (EAH), via investigating the effects of different medication classes on regulatory and adaptive status (RAS). Material and methods.The study included 100 patients with FC II CHF and Stage II EAH, who were randomised into 2 groups. Group I included 53 patients (mean age 52,9±2,3 years) receiving metoprolol succinate (mean dose 97,3±9,5 mg/d). Group II included 47 patients (mean age 57,5±1,3 years) administered quinapril (mean dose 24,7±6,3 mg/d). At baseline and after 6 months of therapy, the following procedures were performed: treadmill test with VO2max assessment; echocardiography; 24-hour blood pressure monitoring; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level measurement; and cardio-respiratory synchronism test. Results.While both medications improved left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, only quinapril demonstrated beneficial effects on LV structure, geometry, and systolic function. Only in Group II, exercise capacity and VO2max increased, RAS improved, and NT-proBNP levels decreased to a greater extent. Conclusion.Quinapril was more effective than metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with FC II CHF and Stage II EAH.