Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?

Abstract Environmental change can expose populations to unfamiliar stressors, and maladaptive responses to those stressors may result in population declines or extirpation. Although gene flow is classically viewed as a cause of maladaptation, small and isolated populations experiencing high levels o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah W. Fitzpatrick, Brendan N. Reid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-08-01
Series:Evolutionary Applications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12768
id doaj-0ec608c611ae40d896fde391c5bd9c5d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ec608c611ae40d896fde391c5bd9c5d2020-11-25T03:44:00ZengWileyEvolutionary Applications1752-45712019-08-011271402141610.1111/eva.12768Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?Sarah W. Fitzpatrick0Brendan N. Reid1W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University Hickory Corners MichiganW.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University Hickory Corners MichiganAbstract Environmental change can expose populations to unfamiliar stressors, and maladaptive responses to those stressors may result in population declines or extirpation. Although gene flow is classically viewed as a cause of maladaptation, small and isolated populations experiencing high levels of drift and little gene flow may be constrained in their evolutionary response to environmental change. We provide a case study using the model Trinidadian guppy system that illustrates the importance of considering gene flow and genetic drift when predicting (mal)adaptive response to acute stress. We compared population genomic patterns and acute stress responses of inbred guppy populations from headwater streams either with or without a recent history of gene flow from a more diverse mainstem population. Compared to “no‐gene flow” analogues, we found that populations with recent gene flow showed higher genomic variation and increased stress tolerance—but only when exposed to a stress familiar to the mainstem population (heat shock). All headwater populations showed similar responses to a familiar stress in headwater environments (starvation) regardless of gene flow history, whereas exposure to an entirely unfamiliar stress (copper sulfate) showed population‐level variation unrelated to environment or recent evolutionary history. Our results suggest that (mal)adaptive responses to acutely stressful environments are determined in part by recent evolutionary history and in part by previous exposure. In some cases, gene flow may provide the variation needed to persist, and eventually adapt, in the face of novel stress.https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12768gene flowgenetic driftPoecilia reticulataRADseqstress responsethermal tolerance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah W. Fitzpatrick
Brendan N. Reid
spellingShingle Sarah W. Fitzpatrick
Brendan N. Reid
Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
Evolutionary Applications
gene flow
genetic drift
Poecilia reticulata
RADseq
stress response
thermal tolerance
author_facet Sarah W. Fitzpatrick
Brendan N. Reid
author_sort Sarah W. Fitzpatrick
title Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
title_short Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
title_full Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
title_fullStr Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
title_full_unstemmed Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
title_sort does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?
publisher Wiley
series Evolutionary Applications
issn 1752-4571
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Environmental change can expose populations to unfamiliar stressors, and maladaptive responses to those stressors may result in population declines or extirpation. Although gene flow is classically viewed as a cause of maladaptation, small and isolated populations experiencing high levels of drift and little gene flow may be constrained in their evolutionary response to environmental change. We provide a case study using the model Trinidadian guppy system that illustrates the importance of considering gene flow and genetic drift when predicting (mal)adaptive response to acute stress. We compared population genomic patterns and acute stress responses of inbred guppy populations from headwater streams either with or without a recent history of gene flow from a more diverse mainstem population. Compared to “no‐gene flow” analogues, we found that populations with recent gene flow showed higher genomic variation and increased stress tolerance—but only when exposed to a stress familiar to the mainstem population (heat shock). All headwater populations showed similar responses to a familiar stress in headwater environments (starvation) regardless of gene flow history, whereas exposure to an entirely unfamiliar stress (copper sulfate) showed population‐level variation unrelated to environment or recent evolutionary history. Our results suggest that (mal)adaptive responses to acutely stressful environments are determined in part by recent evolutionary history and in part by previous exposure. In some cases, gene flow may provide the variation needed to persist, and eventually adapt, in the face of novel stress.
topic gene flow
genetic drift
Poecilia reticulata
RADseq
stress response
thermal tolerance
url https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12768
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahwfitzpatrick doesgeneflowaggravateoralleviatemaladaptationtoenvironmentalstressinsmallpopulations
AT brendannreid doesgeneflowaggravateoralleviatemaladaptationtoenvironmentalstressinsmallpopulations
_version_ 1724516856792875008