Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions

In recent popular publications as well as in widely used information websites directed to cancer patients, valerian is claimed to have a potential of adverse interactions with anticancer drugs. This questions its use as a safe replacement for, for example, benzodiazepines. A review on the interactio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olaf Kelber, Karen Nieber, Karin Kraft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/879396
id doaj-0ebe570d2de94957b9a2e55d85153059
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ebe570d2de94957b9a2e55d851530592020-11-24T23:25:27ZengHindawi LimitedEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine1741-427X1741-42882014-01-01201410.1155/2014/879396879396Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant InteractionsOlaf Kelber0Karen Nieber1Karin Kraft2Working Group Efficacy, Safety and Interactions of Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Straße 218, 53173 Bonn, GermanyWorking Group Efficacy, Safety and Interactions of Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Straße 218, 53173 Bonn, GermanyWorking Group Efficacy, Safety and Interactions of Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Straße 218, 53173 Bonn, GermanyIn recent popular publications as well as in widely used information websites directed to cancer patients, valerian is claimed to have a potential of adverse interactions with anticancer drugs. This questions its use as a safe replacement for, for example, benzodiazepines. A review on the interaction potential of preparations from valerian root (Valeriana officinalis L. root) was therefore conducted. A data base search and search in a clinical drug interaction data base were conducted. Thereafter, a systematic assessment of publications was performed. Seven in vitro studies on six CYP 450 isoenzymes, on p-glycoprotein, and on two UGT isoenzymes were identified. However, the methodological assessment of these studies did not support their suitability for the prediction of clinically relevant interactions. In addition, clinical studies on various valerian preparations did not reveal any relevant interaction potential concerning CYP 1A2, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4. Available animal and human pharmacodynamic studies did not verify any interaction potential. The interaction potential of valerian preparations therefore seems to be low and thereby without clinical relevance. We conclude that there is no specific evidence questioning their safety, also in cancer patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/879396
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olaf Kelber
Karen Nieber
Karin Kraft
spellingShingle Olaf Kelber
Karen Nieber
Karin Kraft
Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
author_facet Olaf Kelber
Karen Nieber
Karin Kraft
author_sort Olaf Kelber
title Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions
title_short Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions
title_full Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions
title_fullStr Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions
title_full_unstemmed Valerian: No Evidence for Clinically Relevant Interactions
title_sort valerian: no evidence for clinically relevant interactions
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
issn 1741-427X
1741-4288
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In recent popular publications as well as in widely used information websites directed to cancer patients, valerian is claimed to have a potential of adverse interactions with anticancer drugs. This questions its use as a safe replacement for, for example, benzodiazepines. A review on the interaction potential of preparations from valerian root (Valeriana officinalis L. root) was therefore conducted. A data base search and search in a clinical drug interaction data base were conducted. Thereafter, a systematic assessment of publications was performed. Seven in vitro studies on six CYP 450 isoenzymes, on p-glycoprotein, and on two UGT isoenzymes were identified. However, the methodological assessment of these studies did not support their suitability for the prediction of clinically relevant interactions. In addition, clinical studies on various valerian preparations did not reveal any relevant interaction potential concerning CYP 1A2, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4. Available animal and human pharmacodynamic studies did not verify any interaction potential. The interaction potential of valerian preparations therefore seems to be low and thereby without clinical relevance. We conclude that there is no specific evidence questioning their safety, also in cancer patients.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/879396
work_keys_str_mv AT olafkelber valeriannoevidenceforclinicallyrelevantinteractions
AT karennieber valeriannoevidenceforclinicallyrelevantinteractions
AT karinkraft valeriannoevidenceforclinicallyrelevantinteractions
_version_ 1725557486710161408