Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda

This study compares risk preferences elicited from two different methods and the resulting inconsistency rates in response behavior. We also identify and compare how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence risk preferences elicited from the two methods. We use experimental and survey...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanna Julia Ihli, Brian Chiputwa, Oliver Musshoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 2016-05-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235193
id doaj-0eaae375699849daa2fed77431e6a376
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0eaae375699849daa2fed77431e6a3762020-11-24T23:59:38ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82852016-05-0141232434510.22004/ag.econ.235193235193Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural UgandaHanna Julia IhliBrian ChiputwaOliver MusshoffThis study compares risk preferences elicited from two different methods and the resulting inconsistency rates in response behavior. We also identify and compare how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence risk preferences elicited from the two methods. We use experimental and survey data collected from 332 randomly selected smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda. We find relatively low inconsistency rates in the response behavior and that both methods classify most farmers as risk averse. However, a closer inspection reveals significantly different risk results. Specific demographic and socioeconomic characteristics affect farmers' risk preferences but are not stable across elicitation methods.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235193elicitation of risk preferencesinconsistency rateslaboratory experiment in the fielduganda
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanna Julia Ihli
Brian Chiputwa
Oliver Musshoff
spellingShingle Hanna Julia Ihli
Brian Chiputwa
Oliver Musshoff
Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
elicitation of risk preferences
inconsistency rates
laboratory experiment in the field
uganda
author_facet Hanna Julia Ihli
Brian Chiputwa
Oliver Musshoff
author_sort Hanna Julia Ihli
title Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda
title_short Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda
title_full Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda
title_fullStr Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda
title_sort do changing probabilities or payoffs in lottery-choice experiments affect risk preference outcomes? evidence from rural uganda
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
publishDate 2016-05-01
description This study compares risk preferences elicited from two different methods and the resulting inconsistency rates in response behavior. We also identify and compare how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence risk preferences elicited from the two methods. We use experimental and survey data collected from 332 randomly selected smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda. We find relatively low inconsistency rates in the response behavior and that both methods classify most farmers as risk averse. However, a closer inspection reveals significantly different risk results. Specific demographic and socioeconomic characteristics affect farmers' risk preferences but are not stable across elicitation methods.
topic elicitation of risk preferences
inconsistency rates
laboratory experiment in the field
uganda
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235193
work_keys_str_mv AT hannajuliaihli dochangingprobabilitiesorpayoffsinlotterychoiceexperimentsaffectriskpreferenceoutcomesevidencefromruraluganda
AT brianchiputwa dochangingprobabilitiesorpayoffsinlotterychoiceexperimentsaffectriskpreferenceoutcomesevidencefromruraluganda
AT olivermusshoff dochangingprobabilitiesorpayoffsinlotterychoiceexperimentsaffectriskpreferenceoutcomesevidencefromruraluganda
_version_ 1725446983244578816