Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) embodies a specific vision of agricultural systems that is highly controversial. The article focuses on how conflicts over GMOs contribute towards food democracy. Food democracy is defined as the possibility for all social groups to participate in, ne...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Politics and Governance |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2082 |
id |
doaj-0eaa4f70a0ad47639bf2ddae7154ec24 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0eaa4f70a0ad47639bf2ddae7154ec242020-11-24T21:24:07ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-10-017416517710.17645/pag.v7i4.20821203Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food DemocracyBeate Friedrich0Sarah Hackfort1Miriam Boyer2Daniela Gottschlich3Institute of Sustainability Governance, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, GermanyIZT—Institute for Future Studies and Technology Assessment, GermanyDepartment of Agriculture and Food Policy, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, GermanyInstitute for Diversity, Nature, Gender and Sustainability, GermanyThe use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) embodies a specific vision of agricultural systems that is highly controversial. The article focuses on how conflicts over GMOs contribute towards food democracy. Food democracy is defined as the possibility for all social groups to participate in, negotiate and struggle over how societies organize agricultural production, thereby ensuring that food systems fulfil the needs of people and sustain (re)productive nature into the future. EU agricultural policy envisages the coexistence of agricultural and food systems with and without GMOs. This policy, which on the surface appears to be a means of avoiding conflict, has in fact exacerbated conflict, while creating obstacles to the development of food democracy. By contrast, empirical analysis of movements against GMOs in Germany and Poland shows how they create pathways towards participation in the food system and the creation of alternative agricultural futures, thereby contributing to a democratization of food systems and thus of society–nature relations. Today, as products of new breeding techniques such as genome editing are being released, these movements are gaining new relevance.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2082agricultureconflictsfood democracygenetically modified organismsnew breeding techniquessocial ecologysocial movementssociety–nature relations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Beate Friedrich Sarah Hackfort Miriam Boyer Daniela Gottschlich |
spellingShingle |
Beate Friedrich Sarah Hackfort Miriam Boyer Daniela Gottschlich Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy Politics and Governance agriculture conflicts food democracy genetically modified organisms new breeding techniques social ecology social movements society–nature relations |
author_facet |
Beate Friedrich Sarah Hackfort Miriam Boyer Daniela Gottschlich |
author_sort |
Beate Friedrich |
title |
Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy |
title_short |
Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy |
title_full |
Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy |
title_fullStr |
Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy |
title_sort |
conflicts over gmos and their contribution to food democracy |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Politics and Governance |
issn |
2183-2463 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) embodies a specific vision of agricultural systems that is highly controversial. The article focuses on how conflicts over GMOs contribute towards food democracy. Food democracy is defined as the possibility for all social groups to participate in, negotiate and struggle over how societies organize agricultural production, thereby ensuring that food systems fulfil the needs of people and sustain (re)productive nature into the future. EU agricultural policy envisages the coexistence of agricultural and food systems with and without GMOs. This policy, which on the surface appears to be a means of avoiding conflict, has in fact exacerbated conflict, while creating obstacles to the development of food democracy. By contrast, empirical analysis of movements against GMOs in Germany and Poland shows how they create pathways towards participation in the food system and the creation of alternative agricultural futures, thereby contributing to a democratization of food systems and thus of society–nature relations. Today, as products of new breeding techniques such as genome editing are being released, these movements are gaining new relevance. |
topic |
agriculture conflicts food democracy genetically modified organisms new breeding techniques social ecology social movements society–nature relations |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2082 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT beatefriedrich conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy AT sarahhackfort conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy AT miriamboyer conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy AT danielagottschlich conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy |
_version_ |
1725989490415108096 |