Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) embodies a specific vision of agricultural systems that is highly controversial. The article focuses on how conflicts over GMOs contribute towards food democracy. Food democracy is defined as the possibility for all social groups to participate in, ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beate Friedrich, Sarah Hackfort, Miriam Boyer, Daniela Gottschlich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-10-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2082
id doaj-0eaa4f70a0ad47639bf2ddae7154ec24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0eaa4f70a0ad47639bf2ddae7154ec242020-11-24T21:24:07ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-10-017416517710.17645/pag.v7i4.20821203Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food DemocracyBeate Friedrich0Sarah Hackfort1Miriam Boyer2Daniela Gottschlich3Institute of Sustainability Governance, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, GermanyIZT—Institute for Future Studies and Technology Assessment, GermanyDepartment of Agriculture and Food Policy, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, GermanyInstitute for Diversity, Nature, Gender and Sustainability, GermanyThe use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) embodies a specific vision of agricultural systems that is highly controversial. The article focuses on how conflicts over GMOs contribute towards food democracy. Food democracy is defined as the possibility for all social groups to participate in, negotiate and struggle over how societies organize agricultural production, thereby ensuring that food systems fulfil the needs of people and sustain (re)productive nature into the future. EU agricultural policy envisages the coexistence of agricultural and food systems with and without GMOs. This policy, which on the surface appears to be a means of avoiding conflict, has in fact exacerbated conflict, while creating obstacles to the development of food democracy. By contrast, empirical analysis of movements against GMOs in Germany and Poland shows how they create pathways towards participation in the food system and the creation of alternative agricultural futures, thereby contributing to a democratization of food systems and thus of society–nature relations. Today, as products of new breeding techniques such as genome editing are being released, these movements are gaining new relevance.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2082agricultureconflictsfood democracygenetically modified organismsnew breeding techniquessocial ecologysocial movementssociety–nature relations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beate Friedrich
Sarah Hackfort
Miriam Boyer
Daniela Gottschlich
spellingShingle Beate Friedrich
Sarah Hackfort
Miriam Boyer
Daniela Gottschlich
Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
Politics and Governance
agriculture
conflicts
food democracy
genetically modified organisms
new breeding techniques
social ecology
social movements
society–nature relations
author_facet Beate Friedrich
Sarah Hackfort
Miriam Boyer
Daniela Gottschlich
author_sort Beate Friedrich
title Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
title_short Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
title_full Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
title_fullStr Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
title_full_unstemmed Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy
title_sort conflicts over gmos and their contribution to food democracy
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2019-10-01
description The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) embodies a specific vision of agricultural systems that is highly controversial. The article focuses on how conflicts over GMOs contribute towards food democracy. Food democracy is defined as the possibility for all social groups to participate in, negotiate and struggle over how societies organize agricultural production, thereby ensuring that food systems fulfil the needs of people and sustain (re)productive nature into the future. EU agricultural policy envisages the coexistence of agricultural and food systems with and without GMOs. This policy, which on the surface appears to be a means of avoiding conflict, has in fact exacerbated conflict, while creating obstacles to the development of food democracy. By contrast, empirical analysis of movements against GMOs in Germany and Poland shows how they create pathways towards participation in the food system and the creation of alternative agricultural futures, thereby contributing to a democratization of food systems and thus of society–nature relations. Today, as products of new breeding techniques such as genome editing are being released, these movements are gaining new relevance.
topic agriculture
conflicts
food democracy
genetically modified organisms
new breeding techniques
social ecology
social movements
society–nature relations
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2082
work_keys_str_mv AT beatefriedrich conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy
AT sarahhackfort conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy
AT miriamboyer conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy
AT danielagottschlich conflictsovergmosandtheircontributiontofooddemocracy
_version_ 1725989490415108096