Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come

Over the past 30 years, policy makers and professionals who provide services to older adults with chronic conditions and impairments have placed greater emphasis on conceptualizing aging in place as an attainable and worthwhile goal. Little is known, however, of the changes in how this concept has e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn, Bernard A. Steinman, Phoebe S. Liebig, Jon Pynoos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Aging Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/120952
id doaj-0ea1175f988146548b0d0a3722f9e0c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ea1175f988146548b0d0a3722f9e0c02020-11-24T20:58:29ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Aging Research2090-22042090-22122012-01-01201210.1155/2012/120952120952Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has ComeSarinnapha Vasunilashorn0Bernard A. Steinman1Phoebe S. Liebig2Jon Pynoos3Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USACenter for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USAAndrus Gerontology Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USAAndrus Gerontology Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USAOver the past 30 years, policy makers and professionals who provide services to older adults with chronic conditions and impairments have placed greater emphasis on conceptualizing aging in place as an attainable and worthwhile goal. Little is known, however, of the changes in how this concept has evolved in aging research. To track trends in aging in place, we examined scholarly articles published from 1980 to 2010 that included the concept in eleven academic gerontology journals. We report an increase in the absolute number and proportion of aging-in-place manuscripts published during this period, with marked growth in the 2000s. Topics related to the environment and services were the most commonly examined during 2000–2010 (35% and 31%, resp.), with a substantial increase in manuscripts pertaining to technology and health/functioning. This underscores the increase in diversity of topics that surround the concept of aging-in-place literature in gerontological research.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/120952
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn
Bernard A. Steinman
Phoebe S. Liebig
Jon Pynoos
spellingShingle Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn
Bernard A. Steinman
Phoebe S. Liebig
Jon Pynoos
Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
Journal of Aging Research
author_facet Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn
Bernard A. Steinman
Phoebe S. Liebig
Jon Pynoos
author_sort Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn
title Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
title_short Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
title_full Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
title_fullStr Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
title_full_unstemmed Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
title_sort aging in place: evolution of a research topic whose time has come
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Aging Research
issn 2090-2204
2090-2212
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Over the past 30 years, policy makers and professionals who provide services to older adults with chronic conditions and impairments have placed greater emphasis on conceptualizing aging in place as an attainable and worthwhile goal. Little is known, however, of the changes in how this concept has evolved in aging research. To track trends in aging in place, we examined scholarly articles published from 1980 to 2010 that included the concept in eleven academic gerontology journals. We report an increase in the absolute number and proportion of aging-in-place manuscripts published during this period, with marked growth in the 2000s. Topics related to the environment and services were the most commonly examined during 2000–2010 (35% and 31%, resp.), with a substantial increase in manuscripts pertaining to technology and health/functioning. This underscores the increase in diversity of topics that surround the concept of aging-in-place literature in gerontological research.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/120952
work_keys_str_mv AT sarinnaphavasunilashorn aginginplaceevolutionofaresearchtopicwhosetimehascome
AT bernardasteinman aginginplaceevolutionofaresearchtopicwhosetimehascome
AT phoebesliebig aginginplaceevolutionofaresearchtopicwhosetimehascome
AT jonpynoos aginginplaceevolutionofaresearchtopicwhosetimehascome
_version_ 1716785699998400512