Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Non-invasive in vivo neuroimaging techniques provide a wide array of possibilities to study human brain function. A number of approaches are available that improve our understanding of the anatomical location of brain activation patterns, including the development of probabilistic conversion tools t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anneke Alkemade, Josephine M. Groot, Birte U. Forstmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnana.2018.00110/full
id doaj-0e94d00f032a41e2bf43770e8f9d8d33
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e94d00f032a41e2bf43770e8f9d8d332020-11-24T21:53:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroanatomy1662-51292018-12-011210.3389/fnana.2018.00110427252Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?Anneke AlkemadeJosephine M. GrootBirte U. ForstmannNon-invasive in vivo neuroimaging techniques provide a wide array of possibilities to study human brain function. A number of approaches are available that improve our understanding of the anatomical location of brain activation patterns, including the development of probabilistic conversion tools to register individual in vivo data to population based neuroanatomical templates. Two elegant examples were published by Horn et al. (2017) in which a method was described to warp DBS electrode coordinates, and histological data to MNI-space (Ewert et al., 2017). The conversion of individual brain scans to a standard space is done assuming that individual anatomical scans provide a reliable image of the underlying neuroanatomy. It is unclear to what extent spatial distortions related to tissue properties, or MRI artifacts exist in these scans. Therefore, the question rises whether the anatomical information from the individual scans can be considered a real ground truth. To accommodate the knowledge-gap as a result of limited anatomical information, generative brain models have been developed circumventing these challenges through the application of assumption sets without recourse to any ground truth. We would like to argue that, although these efforts are valuable, the definition of an anatomical ground truth is preferred. Its definition requires a system in which non-invasive approaches can be validated using invasive methods of investigation. We argue that the application of post mortem MRI studies in combination with microscopy analyses brings an anatomical ground truth for the human brain within reach, which is of importance for all research within the human in vivo neuroimaging field.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnana.2018.00110/fullpost mortem neuroanatomynon-invasive neuroimagingspatial distortions7 Tesla MRIsubcortex
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anneke Alkemade
Josephine M. Groot
Birte U. Forstmann
spellingShingle Anneke Alkemade
Josephine M. Groot
Birte U. Forstmann
Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
post mortem neuroanatomy
non-invasive neuroimaging
spatial distortions
7 Tesla MRI
subcortex
author_facet Anneke Alkemade
Josephine M. Groot
Birte U. Forstmann
author_sort Anneke Alkemade
title Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_short Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_full Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_fullStr Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_full_unstemmed Do We Need a Human post mortem Whole-Brain Anatomical Ground Truth in in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
title_sort do we need a human post mortem whole-brain anatomical ground truth in in vivo magnetic resonance imaging?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
issn 1662-5129
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Non-invasive in vivo neuroimaging techniques provide a wide array of possibilities to study human brain function. A number of approaches are available that improve our understanding of the anatomical location of brain activation patterns, including the development of probabilistic conversion tools to register individual in vivo data to population based neuroanatomical templates. Two elegant examples were published by Horn et al. (2017) in which a method was described to warp DBS electrode coordinates, and histological data to MNI-space (Ewert et al., 2017). The conversion of individual brain scans to a standard space is done assuming that individual anatomical scans provide a reliable image of the underlying neuroanatomy. It is unclear to what extent spatial distortions related to tissue properties, or MRI artifacts exist in these scans. Therefore, the question rises whether the anatomical information from the individual scans can be considered a real ground truth. To accommodate the knowledge-gap as a result of limited anatomical information, generative brain models have been developed circumventing these challenges through the application of assumption sets without recourse to any ground truth. We would like to argue that, although these efforts are valuable, the definition of an anatomical ground truth is preferred. Its definition requires a system in which non-invasive approaches can be validated using invasive methods of investigation. We argue that the application of post mortem MRI studies in combination with microscopy analyses brings an anatomical ground truth for the human brain within reach, which is of importance for all research within the human in vivo neuroimaging field.
topic post mortem neuroanatomy
non-invasive neuroimaging
spatial distortions
7 Tesla MRI
subcortex
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnana.2018.00110/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annekealkemade doweneedahumanpostmortemwholebrainanatomicalgroundtruthininvivomagneticresonanceimaging
AT josephinemgroot doweneedahumanpostmortemwholebrainanatomicalgroundtruthininvivomagneticresonanceimaging
AT birteuforstmann doweneedahumanpostmortemwholebrainanatomicalgroundtruthininvivomagneticresonanceimaging
_version_ 1725873374615306240