Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.

INTRODUCTION:Obstructed labour (OL) is an important clinical and public health problem because of the associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for OL and its associated obstetric squeal are usually context specific. No epidemiological study has documented the risk fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milton W Musaba, Grace Ndeezi, Justus K Barageine, Andrew Weeks, Victoria Nankabirwa, Felix Wamono, Daniel Semakula, James K Tumwine, Julius N Wandabwa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228856
id doaj-0e8801e34af14cb788203b25a9f74e9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e8801e34af14cb788203b25a9f74e9a2021-03-03T21:31:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022885610.1371/journal.pone.0228856Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.Milton W MusabaGrace NdeeziJustus K BarageineAndrew WeeksVictoria NankabirwaFelix WamonoDaniel SemakulaJames K TumwineJulius N WandabwaINTRODUCTION:Obstructed labour (OL) is an important clinical and public health problem because of the associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for OL and its associated obstetric squeal are usually context specific. No epidemiological study has documented the risk factors for OL in Eastern Uganda. This study was conducted to identify the risk factors for OL in Mbale Hospital. OBJECTIVE:To identify the risk factors for OL in Mbale Regional Referral and Teaching Hospital, Eastern Uganda. METHODS:We conducted a case control study with 270 cases of women with OL and 270 controls of women without OL. We consecutively enrolled eligible cases between July 2018 and February 2019. For each case, we randomly selected one eligible control admitted in the same 24-hour period. Data was collected using face-to-face interviews and a review of patient notes. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for OL. RESULTS:The risk factors for OL were, being a referral from a lower health facility (AOR 6.80, 95% CI: 4.20-11.00), prime parity (AOR 2.15 95% CI: 1.26-3.66) and use of herbal medicines in active labour (AOR 2.72 95% CI: 1.49-4.96). Married participants (AOR 0.59 95% CI: 0.35-0.97) with a delivery plan (AOR 0.56 95% CI: 0.35-0.90) and educated partners (AOR 0.57 95% CI: 0.33-0.98) were less likely to have OL. In the adjusted analysis, there was no association between four or more ANC visits and OL, adjusted odds ratio [(AOR) 0.96 95% CI: 0.57-1.63)]. CONCLUSIONS:Prime parity, use of herbal medicines in labour and being a referral from a lower health facility were identified as risk factors. Being married with a delivery plan and an educated partner were protective of OL. Increased frequency of ANC attendance was not protective against obstructed labour.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228856
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milton W Musaba
Grace Ndeezi
Justus K Barageine
Andrew Weeks
Victoria Nankabirwa
Felix Wamono
Daniel Semakula
James K Tumwine
Julius N Wandabwa
spellingShingle Milton W Musaba
Grace Ndeezi
Justus K Barageine
Andrew Weeks
Victoria Nankabirwa
Felix Wamono
Daniel Semakula
James K Tumwine
Julius N Wandabwa
Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Milton W Musaba
Grace Ndeezi
Justus K Barageine
Andrew Weeks
Victoria Nankabirwa
Felix Wamono
Daniel Semakula
James K Tumwine
Julius N Wandabwa
author_sort Milton W Musaba
title Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.
title_short Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.
title_full Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.
title_fullStr Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study.
title_sort risk factors for obstructed labour in eastern uganda: a case control study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:Obstructed labour (OL) is an important clinical and public health problem because of the associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for OL and its associated obstetric squeal are usually context specific. No epidemiological study has documented the risk factors for OL in Eastern Uganda. This study was conducted to identify the risk factors for OL in Mbale Hospital. OBJECTIVE:To identify the risk factors for OL in Mbale Regional Referral and Teaching Hospital, Eastern Uganda. METHODS:We conducted a case control study with 270 cases of women with OL and 270 controls of women without OL. We consecutively enrolled eligible cases between July 2018 and February 2019. For each case, we randomly selected one eligible control admitted in the same 24-hour period. Data was collected using face-to-face interviews and a review of patient notes. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for OL. RESULTS:The risk factors for OL were, being a referral from a lower health facility (AOR 6.80, 95% CI: 4.20-11.00), prime parity (AOR 2.15 95% CI: 1.26-3.66) and use of herbal medicines in active labour (AOR 2.72 95% CI: 1.49-4.96). Married participants (AOR 0.59 95% CI: 0.35-0.97) with a delivery plan (AOR 0.56 95% CI: 0.35-0.90) and educated partners (AOR 0.57 95% CI: 0.33-0.98) were less likely to have OL. In the adjusted analysis, there was no association between four or more ANC visits and OL, adjusted odds ratio [(AOR) 0.96 95% CI: 0.57-1.63)]. CONCLUSIONS:Prime parity, use of herbal medicines in labour and being a referral from a lower health facility were identified as risk factors. Being married with a delivery plan and an educated partner were protective of OL. Increased frequency of ANC attendance was not protective against obstructed labour.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228856
work_keys_str_mv AT miltonwmusaba riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT gracendeezi riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT justuskbarageine riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT andrewweeks riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT victorianankabirwa riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT felixwamono riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT danielsemakula riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT jamesktumwine riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
AT juliusnwandabwa riskfactorsforobstructedlabourineasternugandaacasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1714816457772105728